Laserfiche WebLink
_ . :_ f <br />May 26, 2003 <br />Division of Minerals and Geolog/ <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Attn. Larry D. Oehler <br />Aggregate Iaduetries - QVCR, Inc. <br />Amendment Nal-Jeroaimus Property <br />Permit # M-99-034 <br />Karen Topper ~ <br />8120 E. 104th Avenue <br />Henderson, CO 80640 <br />(303) 838-5636 <br />RECEIVEp/ <br />~Ar Z r 200 <br />Birisi0n ~f Minerals and GealO~y <br />RE: Aggregate Industries - WRC, Inc. ,/~ <br />Cooley Reservoir and Fukon Wildlife Area Amendment No. 1- Jeronimus Property <br />Amendment to Permit No. M-99-034 ~ <br />Dear Mr. Oehler: <br />This correspondence is in reference to Aggregate Industries -WRC, Inc. (AI) regular (112) <br />operation reclamation permit application amendment to existing permit M-99-034. I had <br />previously registered my objections to the applicant's ameadmerlt application in a letter to your <br />officc dated April 3, 2003. One of my concerns was the issue of ground water quality. I have <br />recently contacted a representative with the Water Quality Contra} Division of the Colorado <br />Department of Heahh and Environment to inquire as to the status ofthe applican's wastewater <br />discharge permit. I was surprised to learn that the Water Quality Control Division issued a <br />"genera]" wastewater discharge permit to Aggregate Industries with an effective date of October <br />1, 2002. "Generai" permits for process water and stormwater are not site specific. This type of <br />permit does not address the reintroduction of existing adsorbed contaminants into the ground <br />water environment. Unlike asite-specific discharge permit, requests for "general" permits do <br />not have public ~tification or comment period. As such, the public was not afforded an <br />opportunity to brirrgtireir concerns far~raid and tltc IYvisron dut notrevieww3tie "siCe=specific <br />water quality ramifications of this proposed mining operation! <br />Having specifically been told by the applicant's representative that the permit application <br />documents I received were current, I am very disturbed wiry the applicant included an August <br />10, 1999 discharge pemut certification letter in Appendix D ofthe application rather than the <br />new certifcation that was readily available: The current CDPS Industrial General Permit 110. <br />COG-500000 has no requirements for ground water quality monitoring and has not been <br />zeviewed for antidegradation. Ibring this issue to your attention as anther inconsistency in the <br />permit application documents, and request that the Division of Minerals and Geology assure that <br />the appropriate documents are submitted and that they meet the Division's rules and regulations. <br />