Laserfiche WebLink
SOLID PHASE CHARACTERIZATION <br />The solid phase calcium and magnesium Content <br />used for this Calculation must ba limited to <br />chat present as carboaat ea. <br />For this waste the time co deplece the 6.4 <br />milllmoles of carbonate minerals vas tar less <br />than chat for sulfide mineral depletion. In the <br />inlt Sal rinses, 2.7 mil limo les of calcium and <br />magnes Sum were released, and [he average sub- <br />sequent release rate vas calculated ae 0.093 <br />mi111mo les/week. ih is yie lde a came of 40 veeka <br />for carbonate mineral depletion. It it is <br />assumed chat [he magnee ium release Ss no[ from a <br />carbonate mineral, the time for carbonate <br />mineral depletion becomes Sl ve eks. The <br />calculated times of buffering dap le[ion are con- <br />current with a decrease in drainage pH, <br />suggesting chat the pro]ecced dap lesion [imea <br />are fairly accurate (f Sgu re 2). T_tle pH <br />decreased rapidly Erom 8.7 a[ vee to 6.0 at <br />week 56. I[ remained stable near 6.0 for about <br />20 weeks and [hen dropped below S. Dissolution <br />of host rock minerals may have contributed [o <br />th Sa final phase of buffering. <br />SULIHARY <br />The acid producing character of some wastes <br />can not be clearly identified by acid-base <br />accounts or in the time frame of klne tic testa <br />c ondut[ed on the wastes. This study ind icatea <br />chat a more detailed evaluation can be made by <br />decerminiag the acid producing and acid <br />consuming mineral content of [he vast e, the <br />rates of acid production and acid consumption, <br />and the times required Co deplete [he acid <br />producing iron sulf idea and [ha acid neutral- <br />izing minerals. The carbonate buffering mineral <br />content of the solid tested vas deeermiaad by <br />ad]usting the analyzed neutralization potential <br />(Sobek et al., 1978) for background inter- <br />ference. The ad]usced value vas 0.5 ae oppo eed <br />co 11 t/1000 C for the analyzed value, <br />Snd Stating chat the unad]usted value subetan- <br />[lally owe restlmated [he [rue neutralizing <br />potential. <br />Second, [he races of acid production and <br />consumption were calculated based the observed <br />chemical release to solution over a 20 week <br />period. Finally, the [imea required for <br />dap letlon of sulf Sda sad carbonate buffering <br />miners le were calculated using these rates and <br />the initial compoe it ion of the solid. These <br />calculated deplat ion [imea were In goad agree- <br />ment with [he observed drainage quality. Thla <br />ind ice ces chat £mplicatlone on [he ac ld pro- <br />ducing character of mine wastes can 6e extended <br />beyond the experimental time frame of kinetic <br />tests. Ihis extension is based on solid phase <br />charac[eriz at ion and chemical analysis of ChC <br />drainage generated in [he kinetic ces [s. <br />These re su Ste indicate that it Ls possible to <br />calculate the time required [o deplece acid <br />producing and acid consuming minerals in mine <br />wastes. However, the conclue lone reached are <br />based on limited data. The approach used is <br />10 <br />S <br />0 7i <br />fi f <br />5 <br />w <br />,yep .• <br />{ IZ <br />~ {~ <br />i et <br />85 <br />6 ' ~ <br />3 ~ i ~ <br />i'. <br />-' \~ Pndlellone ~ <br />5 1 _ for HP depletion i 1 <br />\ i 11 <br />Lr \; i <br />0 <br />0 l0 20 JO !0 50 60 70 80 90 <br />Time IreekN <br />Figure 2. Predicted depletion of solid phae• <br />neutralization pa tential and observed <br />pH ve. time. <br />preliminary and the experimental methods may be <br />modified and [ha aeaumptloae ref fined. For <br />example, more refined solid ph~w analyeea <br />(Pignolet-Brandom and Lapakko, 1990a, 19906) <br />before end after kinetic exper~ma¢[a may Snc tease <br />the accuracy of mineral deplat on rata quantifi- <br />cation, as yell ae aeeeesirtg [~e val ldlty of <br />aeaumptione such ae constant d eaolutfon rates <br />over time. Additional work, some of which Ss in <br />progre se, fie required to better assess the <br />assumptions and methods employed. <br />ACKNO{7LEDCEnENTS <br />David Anconeon directed the laboratory experiment <br />for this pro]ect. Cal Jokela and Anne Jagunich <br />assisted Sn water quality sampling and analysis <br />of spec if lc conductance, pN, acidity, and a1ka11- <br />ni[y. Aqueous trace metals antl sulfate were <br />analyzed by Albert Klaysmat aatl Jean Drotts, <br />respectively. Albert Klaysmat vee also respons- <br />ible for solids analysis Sn a very limited time <br />frame. Tony Deneka and Jon Yagner were respons- <br />ible for computer data managemknt. Financial <br />assistance vaa provided by the LTV Steel Mining <br />Company. <br />