Laserfiche WebLink
<br />82 <br />~' <br />MINQVG AND MINERAL. PROCESSING WASTES <br />the difference between thaw values (Sobak at <br />al., 1978) os ~:hs it ratio (Caruccio et al., <br />L980). Analya:La of solid phase charatteriatics <br />such ae th era can ba done relatively quickly and <br />at low coat, but they do not provide the rates <br />at which ac Sd :Ls producad~or neutralized. <br />the r.3tes of at id production and coneump- <br />tlon can 6e ad<Ire ssed Ln kinetic testa. These <br />tea [e era typically more expene ive and time <br />consuming 'Chan static [eats. Detection of acid <br />generation of [::x .an Snit ial lag period requires <br />an extended period of experimentation (Had in and <br />Erickson, 1988,. Mille[ and Murz ay, 1988). <br />Erroaeoua concl.ue tone could be draw based <br />se ricely on the drainage quality observed during <br />the Ce9[9. Neutral drainage could be observed <br />over the rule tl.vely shore duration of the tee[ <br />but, over a longer period in the field, Che <br />aeutrellzat:ion pa [tent Sal could depleted with <br />resultant dra icagn ac ldiF icaClon. Thus, [he <br />rates of acid procluc[ion and consumption can ba <br />determined frox kinetic teats, but St may be <br />time consuming co experimentally determine if <br />the acid neat ralir.Sng capacity will be depleted <br />before the acid producing capacity. <br />To determine the potential for some mine <br />vaetee to produce acid drainage SC ie neceaeery <br />co quant Sfy the tlmea requlced to deplete the <br />ac ld producing ircn gulf idea and the acid <br />neutralizing mine vale. The following study vas <br />undertaken to as ae ae the feasibll icy of each <br />quant if icat lone far refining mine waste drainage <br />quality pred Sctioae. <br />METHODS <br />Materials <br />Ainetic expe rimert[e vere canduc[ed on <br />mixtures of rot.iry kiln fines and rock using a <br />vet-dry cycle of one week. Aotary kiln fines <br />are a waste product generated when limea[ana Se <br />converted to Lime, and vere ob[aiaed from Che <br />Cutler-Magner Cnmpeny fn Duluth. Chemical and <br />particle size analyses of these solids era <br />presented in cable 1. <br />Table 1. Chemical and particle size analyaia of <br />AIC floss. <br />Values in Percent passing <br />weight percent by weight <br />Ca0 35.9 LOI1 26.37 4 mesh 100 <br />Mg0 1.1 n12U.1 3.71 20 mesh 99.97 <br />Hn 0.03 Fe20} 2.63 200 mesh 96.74 <br />!Lose on Sgnit ion <br />the rock used vas from the Duluth Complex Sn <br />northeastern Minnesota (drill core temple <br />755-1338), the plus 10 mesh fraction of minus <br />1/4 inch drill core raj act vea at:ags crushed <br />using a pule erizar and vet-screened to segregate <br />the -100(+270 fcactlon for use Sm [he kinetic <br />testa. The sulfur, capper, nickel, cabal[, and <br />zinc can [tote of [h!e fret[ ion vere 2.1, 0.11, <br />0.053, 0.007, sad 0.069 percent, respectively. <br />P laginclaee, oily lne, pyrox toes, Sad b1oClte v.: re <br />[he predominant mineral o. <br />A mass o: 0.189 g RK fines vas added to /i I; <br />of rock, producing an alkaline so Lid:aulfur ratio <br />of 0.5:1. :n order to thoroughly blend the <br />alkallme solids with the rock, the alkaline <br />solids/rock mlxturse vere peened through a sample <br />sp litter 10 times. The sulfur content and [he <br />neat raliz atioa potential of [he r~~ck and RK fi~aes <br />vere determined, and the aeaociated values for <br />[he mixture vere calculated. <br />Table 2. Sulfur content and NY of rock, RR <br />fines, and the mixture. <br />Ratio ZS App N4 <br />Rock 2.1 65 11 <br />RR fines .03 1 755 <br />Hlzture 2.08 65 k1C a,¢ <br />Procedure <br />Several tech ntque• have been uaad in labora~- <br />cory leaching aE mining vaetee (Caruccio, 1986; <br />Fe rguaon and Ma:z.ling, 1986). Tha method uaad vas <br />based on the prLneipl• that sulf lde minerals <br />oxidize in the ~p reaene• of atmospheric oxygen and <br />water (Gott •eha Ll[ and Bushier, 1912; Caruccio •tt <br />al., 1980). That axpsrlasnte vase conduetsd in <br />units deaignad :o parmlc ehs rinsing of eolida <br />and filtrst iom Sri the rinse talus Lon in one et ep <br />(U.S. Patent No. 4,783,318). the mixtures vere <br />placed onto a l.~i micron Whatman CF/A glass fi~oer <br />filter (5.5 cm ~i:Lameter) which ce•+e red a pleat Lc <br />plate In Che upper section of a two-stage filter <br />unit or reactor. <br />The reac BOre tad ealtde ware scored in a boat <br />to dry and ozid:L::e. A .cover vas placed about i <br />cm above the upl~nr edge of the box to allw <br />drying of th• eo:lid• and prohibit ih• input of <br />airborn debris. A the rmoetatltally controlled <br />heating pad vas ),laced beneath eho be: to mein~- <br />tain a constant temperature. Yatar containers <br />were placed in tl,a box, and • humidifier and <br />dehumidif ire watt:: placed in the room, in an <br />attempt to maint::la a fairly constant humidity. <br />Temperature and to letivs humidity in the box vie re <br />monitored four to five times per weak. the <br />temperature rani;nd from 23 to 32 ~~C. with a mean <br />of 26.7 °C and .t standard day iation of 1.55 °C. <br />Relative humldit~. ranged from 18 to B3 percent, <br />with a mean of :ili.l and ^ standard deviation o:E <br />10.6. <br />The eolida vets rinsed weakly vtth 200-mL <br />va lumen of diae:L:.led deianixed water. The 200 ,eL <br />