Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It is important to note that the NAP Net NP of samples RK-~ and TL-4 was lower than <br />the mineralogic Net NP and for sample RK-3 the '• •~:,P Net NP was •:.dy sli,~lrt;y higher than the <br />mineralogic Net NP. The mineralogic Net NP values for these three samples ranged from -48 <br />to -67 kg CaCO3/t, suggesting that conditions during the hydrogen peroxide oxidation should <br />have been fairly acidic. Nonetheless, the NAP Net NP values indicated little, if any, excessive <br />acid neutralization by minerals other than those containing calcium carbonate or magnesium <br />carbonate. The wmbined quartz, mica, and clay (chlorite, kaolinite, montmorillonite) content <br />of these samples ranged from roughly 60 to 80 percent (Table 2). The NAP Net NP values <br />indicate that these minerals did not dissolve extensively, with attendant acid geutralization, <br />despite the aggressive nature of the solution generated during the hydrogen peroxilde oxidation. <br />The extremely low Net NP value determined for sample RK4 is most unusu&1. The NAP <br />Test determined a Net NP of -103 kg CaCO~/t of this sample. However, the maximum acid <br />production based on the sulphur wntent of this sample (2.9 percent) is 91 kg C~CO,/t. This <br />discrepancy is difficult to explain other than by error introduced in sample splittihg. <br />APPLICATION OF THE NAP TEST <br />The NAP Test has been proposed as a static test which could be applied in tote field. The <br />results for these ten samples suggest that although predictions by the NAP Test a#e reasonably <br />consistent with those of other static tests, application of the NAP Test in the >field requires <br />several precautions. <br />First, the NAP Test is subject to the same limitations as other static tests. That is, it <br />does not determine the availability of acid-producing and acid-consuming minertals nor their <br />relative rates of reaction. These limitations are of particular concern in predicting if waste rock <br />will produce acidic drainage. These concerns can be addressed qualitatively by determining the <br />mode of occurrence ofrron sulphide, calcium carbonate, and magnesium carbonate mineral in <br />individual rock units contributing to mine waste. Kinetic tests will provide a mor@ quantitative <br />determination of availability and relative reaction rates, and must be conducted on particle sizes <br />which reflect the sulphide and carbonate mineral occurrence in the mine waste. <br />Second, the NAP Test often overestimates the Net NP by amounts dependent upon the <br />sample composition. The potential for overestimation increases as the mineralbgic Net NP <br />decreases below zero. The potential overestimation also increases with the content of minerals <br />which dissolve under conditions of the test, but will not maintain a neutral drainage in the field. <br />This potential error can be reduced by subjecting a series of well-characterized stimples from <br />rock units of concern to the NAP Test. The results from this testing will quantif}}(( the error in <br />Net NP and provide a means of calibrating subsequent measurements on samples from the rock <br />unit. <br />Furthermore, sources of error in the NAP Test may be reduced by additional procedural <br />modifications. Results from the present test indicated close to 100 percent oxidation of the iron <br />sulphides present in the samples examined. The excess acid neutralized by silicate mineral <br />dissolution may be reduced by maintaining lower reaction temperatures or higher solution pH <br />156 <br />