Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Duncan and Bruynesteyn (1979), respectively. The Net Acid Production Test (Coastech <br />Research Inc., 1989) was modified to use a stronger peroxide so ution and to incorpn~ate recent <br />advancements by O'Shay et al. (1990). To a 1.00 g mine waste sample (80% minus 200 mesh) <br />100 mL of hydrogen peroxide (at least 30~ v/v with distilled) was added incrementally (since <br />the reaction of hydrogen peroxide and sulphide can be violent), and the mixture was heated to <br />near boiling for one hour. If the peroxide was depleted after one hour, 50 mL of peroxide was <br />added and heated for 30 minutes. The flask was cooled for ]0 to 15 minutes and 1 mL of <br />0.0157 M copper solution was added and the mixture was boiled for 10 minutes. The solids <br />were removed by filtration and washed with 1 M CaClz. A sample of the filtrate was then <br />titrated to pH 7.0. Four samples were analyzed for sulphur before and after the NAP test (RK- <br />4, TL-1, TL-3, TL-6). <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Chemical and mineralogical analyses indicated the samples displayed fair degree of <br />compositional diversity. The sulphur content of the ten mine waste samples ranged from 0.46 <br />to 5.81 percent, and from 88 to 99 percent of the sulphur was present as sulphide (Table 1). <br />Pyrite was the predominant iron sulphide in all samples except RK-2, TL-3, and TL-6, in which <br />pyrrhotite dominated. The calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate mineral content of the <br />samples ranged from trace amounts to a maximum of 4.6 percent. Siderite was also present in <br />measurable amounts in four of the samples (Table 2). Quartz, feldspar, and mica were the <br />major host rock minerals in all samples except TL-6. <br />The NAP Test was evaluated based on <br />1) qualitative comparison of predictions by the NAP Test with those by the standard ABA, <br />Modified ABA, and B. C. Research Initial Tests on whether or not a mines waste sample <br />would produce acidic drainage, <br />2) quantitative comparison of Net NP values determined by the NAP Test with those <br />determined by the other three static tests and the Net NP determined based on sample <br />composition, and <br />3) qualitative comparison of Net NP values with mineralogical analyses of the samples <br />tested. <br />Static test prediction of whether or not a mine waste will produce acidic drainage can be <br />based on the Net NP determined by the test. Steffen, Robertson and Kirsten (B.C.) Inc. et al. <br />(1989) indicated that "based on general experience, values of Net NP in the range !(between) -20 <br />and +20 tonnes of CaCOl/1000 t of sample (-2 to +2% CaCO,) may be considered to have the <br />ability to generate net acidity." It was further noted by Ferguson (1989) that there was poor <br />agreement among static tests on the acid generating character of samples with Net NP values in <br />this range. To simplify data presentation, Net NP values in this range will be referred to as <br />inconclusive. Values below -20 kg CaCO,/t imply the sample is acid producing, while values <br />148 <br />