My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-12-16_REVISION - M1977344
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977344
>
2002-12-16_REVISION - M1977344
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2020 1:01:05 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977344
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/2002
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Review-Response
From
Holcim (US) Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DMG <br />December 13, 2002 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Response: No water wells other than those associated with Holcim's monitoring program are <br />within 600 feet down gradient of the proposed or existing CKD disposal azeas. <br />NEW ADEQUACY ITEMS: <br />Item No. 22 <br />DMG: Please send a signed copy of your initial adequacy response <br />Response: A signed copy of the initial Holcim response is attached. <br />Item No. 23 <br />DMG: Well MW-10 is no longer down gradient and may be of no use for monitoring for <br />migration of possible ground water contaminants. Holcim should determine it wants to propose <br />using this well for the purpose of determining ambient ground water conditions. <br />Response: As outlined in the attached Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Holcim proposes that MW- <br />10 be sampled for four (4) additional quarters to compile the ambient groundwater data set for <br />DMG to consider prior to its determination of the required groundwater monitoring parameters <br />for this site. <br />kem No. 24 <br />DMG: Holcim included a summary of the water sample analyses for monitoring wells 5, 7, 8, 9, <br />and 10 in the submittal for your proposed ftmendment No. /. Please include that summary in <br />your response to this TR-6 second adequacy review. <br />Response: A summary table of groundwater sampling data for these wells is included in the <br />Groundwater Monitoring Plan attached to this response. <br />Item No. 25 <br />DMG: The Division has approved the location of monitoring well MW-9... The well must be <br />within the permit boundary. This item can be resolved by changing the boundary by means of <br />your proposed amendment No. 1, enough to include the well site... Holcim should also include the <br />boundary change on a revised TR-6 (Fig. 2) map. <br />Response: The formal permit boundary will be resolved in Holcim's future response to DMG's <br />adequacy review of proposed Amendment No. 1. In the meantime, Figure 2 from TR-6 has been <br />revised to address the inclusion of MW-9 within the permit boundary, and is attached to this <br />response as a figure in the Groundwater Monitoring Plan. <br />Item No. 26 <br />DMG: We want Holcim to propose a CKD disposal plan that covers a period of at least 10 <br />years; a plan to determine ambient ground water quality and a plan for continued monitoring <br />and analysis of the ground water including points of compliance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.