My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-02-14_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2003-02-14_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:09:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/14/2003
Doc Name
Fax of selected AM4 and TR12 documents to Grand County Officials
From
DMG
To
Grand County Officials
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On July 9, 2002, Henderson received the formal cost estimate for financial <br />warranty (FW) from the DMG. DMG's cost calculations increased the amount of the <br />FW required of Henderson from the present $10,133,000 to $54,695,000. A copy <br />of this fetter is included as Exhibit A. The DMG cost calculation spreadsheets <br />included with the letter are included by reference. <br />The referenced letter specified three options available to Henderson for reducing <br />the amount of the required FW. These options included revision of °...the <br />reclamation plan in order to reflect a reduced cost.", demonstration by Henderson <br />that some cost estimates by DMG are excessive, and performance of recamation <br />on site to reduce the FW. <br />This TR (TR-12) seeks to reduce the FW amount prior to final approval by DMG. <br />The TR discusses several specific areas for revision of the Permit and proposes <br />concomitant decreases in the FW amount required in the DMG letter. <br />This TR meets the requirements of the Minerals Rules and Regulations of the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board (Rules) for TRs as opposed to <br />Amendments and includes discussions that respond to the issues presented in <br />Exhibit A and DMG's costing estimate package. <br />2.0 NEED FOR THE TECHNICAL REVISIQN <br />The rationale for TR-12 is twofold. First, it updates the Henderson Permit in <br />several technical areas that have been under discussion internally for some time. <br />Second, and most importantly, it utilizes those changes to more accurately adjust <br />DMG's 540 percent FW increase for Henderson. <br />As DMG is acutely aware, the face of mine reclamation and closure bonds has <br />changed dramatically over the past 7 years. Prior to approximately the mid-1990s, <br />most mineral producing interests could obtain such bonds with a simple call to <br />their insurance carriers. Premiums, although historically high, were reasonably <br />affordable. During the 1990s, and more specifically since about the mid-1990s, <br />straight insurance bonds for reclamation and closure have become increasingly <br />difficult to obtain and significantly more expensive when they can be obtained. <br />Similar to automobile insurance firms cancelling policies for excessive citations <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.