My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-12-16_REVISION - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2005-12-16_REVISION - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/2005
Doc Name
Regular 112 Application
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br />2. In the case where the mining area is large enough that implementing the concept in <br />item 1 above will not work, the mining process will be implemented in such a fashion <br />that backfill material stockpiled on top of mineable sand will only have to be moved <br />once to do the backfilling. <br />3. As a rule, freshly removed soil and overburden will not be stockpiled on top of <br />replaced soil and overburden. Instead, when an area is backfilled it will be seeded at <br />the next planting period. <br />4. In most cases, this process of stockpiling works best if the soil and overburden is <br />stockpiled adjacent to the mining area AND parallel to the direction of mining. <br />Stockpiling ahead of the operation (in an area that will be mined next) can be done, but <br />greatly increases the cost of backfilling due to increased haulage costs. Stockpiling <br />behind the mining operation should only occur with an initial cut into a new mining <br />area. <br />The object of this pre-planning of the stockpiling locations is to create a situation <br />where the overburden can simply be pushed back into the mined out pit and then the <br />soil spread over the top of the backfilled area. In this way, backfilling is least <br />expensive and reclamation can be implemented more promptly. <br />6. It is also important to keep access corridors to the mining operation in locations that do <br />not block the ability to reclaim mined out areas. That is, temporary access roads should <br />not be arranged so they go through areas that are being reclaimed. Ideally, access roads <br />should follow routes that go around the perimeter of lands being reclaimed so the <br />reclamation of a relatively large area is not divided into smaller units. When a <br />reclamation parcel is broken into a patchwork of smaller pieces by various roads or <br />other mining activities, those areas reclaimed later often remain visibly different from <br />the older reclamation for decades. Eventually the appearance of the reclaimed areas <br />will merge, but that can take a very long time. Although keeping access corridors away <br />from reclamation is not required, whenever possible, it should be implemented in the <br />interest of efficient reclamation. It will be recognized that such a separation is not <br />always feasible or necessarily efficient in all cases. When separation is not possible it <br />should always be for a good reason. <br />Coal Creek Sand Resource Amendment 3 (2005) - M-1988-044 Exhibit D Page 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.