My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-12-16_REVISION - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2005-12-16_REVISION - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:42:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/2005
Doc Name
Regular 112 Application
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINING PLAN <br />material into the active mining areas downslope from the reclamation. But if the reclamation is <br />downslope from the mining, the mining pits themselves provide some protection for the reclaimed <br />land. Heary sediment discharge from strong storms would more likely be deposited in the active pit, <br />capturing both the water and the sediment, producing less damage to the reclaimed land. Such an <br />event might introduce excessive fines into the mined material making it more difficult to clean, but <br />that is considered to be more easily solved than having to regrade, possibly retopsoil, and replant large <br />areas of destroyed reclamation. This is not to say that damage to the reclamation could not occur. It <br />can occur irrespective of which direction the mining occurs, in either the lowland or the upland <br />situation. Specifying the general direction of mining is a matter of reducing the probabilities of severe <br />damage. <br />Access Routes to Mining Areas: Besides the established, existing roadways that provide <br />access for all parties to various portions of the property, separate access routes maybe required to <br />mining locations that are not adjacent to or very near existing, established roads. Three primary <br />conditions control the location of these access routes. <br />1. The access route should avoid crossing drainages, if possible. If a drainage must be <br />crossed then the location of the crossing must: <br />a. Cross at locations where no wetlands are present at the crossing or within <br />about 50 feet upstream or downstream from the crossiug. <br />b. If the drainage is active then provisions must be made for establishing <br />water crossings. An active drainage is one that consistently carries water in a <br />volume that would potentially wash out a roadway. Crossings near the head of a <br />drainageway would very likely not require water crossings, but further down <br />that same drainage where there is a well established channel the crossing would <br />very likely require a water crossing. <br />i. Appropriate water crossings can include anything from a low water <br />roadway to a culvert, depending on the circumstances. <br />ii. The object of the water crossing is to avoid creating a dam in the <br />drainage and to allow water to pass without becoming severely <br />contaminated with sediment. <br />c. Each situation where a crossing is required will be considered on the basis of <br />the circumstances at that location, taking into account on the ground evidence <br />of normal flow volumes, the existence of a discrete channel, and nature of the <br />vegetation in the drainage. <br />Coal Creek Sand Resource Amendment 3 (2005) - M-1988-044 Exhibit D Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.