Laserfiche WebLink
~S <br />~ `~ 999' 43 y `'~-7`~- 6 3 <br />~- <br />000LEY RESERVOIR AND FULTON WILDLIFE AREA PIT ~r~ / <br />~~ EXHIBIT L-RECLAMATION COSTS ~~~ f ~~a~ e to `~ us i r i e S <br />q.t <br />~~ t" <br />This is a revision for the reclamation costs included in the August 11, 1999 submittal. <br />The estimated costs for reclamation bonding associated with the proposed interior dike <br />are below: <br />• 64to~la ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RECLAMATION BONDING <br />-~' OF THE INTERIOR DIKE <br />ESTIMATED COSTS FOR RECLAMATION BONDING ~ ~ 3 ~~q70 ~'' <br />ALREADY COMPLETED / <br />Activi Approximate Unit Unit Totat <br /> Cost Cost <br />].Constructing an intersecting slurry ~~~-~~~ <br />5' depth x 40 LF $3.00. $1 ~ <br />wa11200 feet from each end of the = I Yo-d (-i` ~~3 %' ~ U ~ U 0~ <br />~ <br />dike will be constructed to tie-into <br />existing slurry wall_ <br />2. Backfill and Regrade Slopes 379,260 CY $0.70 $265,482 <br /> Subtotal $2 2 3a7VhZ <br />p <br />i 5%AdministrativeCon tingenc $1~ S <br />o <br />~ ~ TOTAL t `~~ $266,652 3 ~ 2fi '~ ~ <br /> s% .--~~ <br />Activi <br />1. Backfill and Regrade Slopes <br />2. Prepare and Place Topsoil <br />Approximate <br />Amount <br />244,440 <br />6,875 <br />Subtotal <br />5% Administral <br />TOTAL <br />Unit Unit <br />Cost <br />CY $0.70 <br />CY $Q35 <br />ive Contingency <br />Total <br />Cost 3 g/~ ~ <br />$171,108 <br />$2,406 <br />$173,514 <br />$8,676 <br />$182,189 <br />The DMG staff determined that a bond of $925,300 was the appropriate bond amount for <br />this entire project. The technical revision of adding an interior dike cost estimate is <br />$266,682. Since $182,189 of the reclamation work has already been completed and the <br />proposed interior dike is scheduled to begin construction within the next 30 days, <br />Aggregate Industries proposes that the original bonding amount is adequate. Most of the <br />construction wou]d be competed in such a short period of time that a new bond would <br />not serve a useful purpose to protect the State. We would propose that if the construction <br />is not substantially comptete and in compli ~ the plans and specifications within <br />one year, hat at that tir~r e the bonding would be reviewe d possibly modified. eb <br />ew~w~ b~ 9 a si 3 o-o `° 3~ ~ 7° r <br />3 ~i, ate' RECEIVED .-- i g z r 8 q <br />~ * ~ I ,3~ MAR 2 9 2002 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />