Laserfiche WebLink
CELL 2 38 56 16,17 <br /> <br />PHASE 7 CELL 1 38 50 18,19 <br /> CELL 2 51 NA 20 <br /> <br />PHASE 8 CELL 1 51 NA 21 <br /> <br />PHASE 9 CELL 1 50 NA 22 <br /> <br />PHASE 10 CELL 1 44 75 23,24 <br /> CELL 2 52 71 25,26 <br /> CELL 3 52 71 25,26 <br /> <br />PLANT AREA CELL 1 52 71 25,26 <br />7.4. DISCUSSION <br />!n some cases cell depth and soil types were similar enough to allow setbacks to <br />be determined from the determination of another cell. For example, the depth <br />and soil types of cell 2 and cell 3 of phase 10 were similar and therefore setback <br />recommendations for cell 2 are based on analysis for cell 3. <br />Overall, recommended setbacks are consistent with values used for other pits <br />previously analyzed by Weiland, Inc with similar soils and depth. Recommended <br />setback distances from streams could be tightened with better phreatic surface <br />data, however these analyses are based on conservative estimations and would <br />therefore satisfy regulators. <br />