My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-22_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-22_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 10:42:00 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/22/1990
Doc Name
SAN LUSI PROJECT PERMIT AMENDMENT FN M-88-112
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />ADEQUACY RESPONSES - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <br />PAGE 6 OF 7 <br />The Division's concern was that the V-shaped channels would promote <br />erosion. Given the low velocities and the intent that the channel would <br />be overtopped in a large storm event, erosion is not expected to occur in <br />the channels. The channels will be monitored for sediment build-up and <br />erosion until reclamation release. If either of these conditions occurs, <br />the channel design will be re-evaluated and BMR will implement appropriate <br />correction actions as approved by the Division. <br />43. Responses to a, b and c are satisfactory. The information wanted in comment <br />d was the velocity for the PMP event in the grassed area and not the <br />velocity for the 100 year 24 hour event. Please provide. Figure F-3 should <br />be revised to show the energy dissipation structure at the base of the <br />spillway. In addition, the low flow spillway should be constructed in the <br />center of the spillway rather than off to one side. <br />The peak discharge onto the tailings disposal area is estimated at 9,220 <br />cfs during the PMP event. Routing of the flow through the tailings disposal <br />area and reclamation spillway will reduce the peak discharge to 6,220 cfs <br />in the spillway. A discharge velocity of 8.1 feet per second is expected <br />in the revegetated section of the channel during the PMP event. Attachment <br />3 presents the velocity calculations. <br />44. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />45. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />46. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />47. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />48. Rev ised Exhibit L has not yet been provided. <br />Based on agreement of the reclamation plan for the tailings disposal area, <br />Exhibit L, Reclamation Costs, will be presented for review. <br />49. Revised Exhibit L has not yet been provided. <br />Based on agreement of the reclamation plan for the tailings disposal area, <br />Exhibit L, Reclamation Costs, will be presented for review. <br />50. Revised Exhibit L has not yet been provided. <br />Based on agreement of the reclamation plan for the tailings disposal area, <br />Exhibit L, Reclamation Casts, will be presented for review. <br />51. Revised Exhibit L has not yet been provided. <br />Based on agreement of the reclamation plan for the tailings disposal area, <br />Exhibit L, Reclamation Costs, will be presented for review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.