Laserfiche WebLink
Revised 07/06/97 Minutes- June 26-27, 1997 Page 41 <br /> (G 4, r L� 'y,-,.., <br /> clarified that the difference between the two plans is that th%original plan�not there, it would have <br /> to be developed except for the two holding ponds already in existence. So there will be no more <br /> water unless they develop it and that will be water that comes in as rainfall, it will not be stream <br /> flow into those other ponds and may only be seasonal. Mr. Cohan pointed out the benefits of the <br /> new proposed plan as it would reduce evaporation loss and the impacts on the static groundwater <br /> levels on the adjacent property would remain the same. <br /> The Board then closed the Hearing and opened Board deliberation. The Board Moved to approve <br /> Western Mobile's Amendment 002 with the conditions proposed and revised by the Division and <br /> Western Mobile. Seconded and Approved. (For: Kraeger-Rovey, Cooley, Cohan, Paulin and <br /> Ernst) and (Opposed: Green and Cattany). <br />