Laserfiche WebLink
9E+ i++li0? 1:3:1' $ '~~_ 565 ??47 ER Y. DENVER 03 <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, SAN LUIS PROJECT <br />CMI.RD ADEQUACY LETTER RESPONSES <br />Page 6 of 28 <br />The natural moisture content of the 5ubsoil5 is conservatively <br />estimated at above five percent. Using methods outlined in McWhorter <br />and Nelson (1979), the specific retention is estimateo to be about <br />10 percent. Therefore, the soil moisture content would have to be <br />increased by five percent for unsaturated flow Condit ons to occur <br />and a seepage plume commence tv migrate down to the water table. <br />Based upon the above assumptions the pro,)ected rate of permeation <br />would be 3 x 10-3 cu ft/yr/ft of liner. The effect of this flow rate <br />would increase the moisture content of the compacted subsoil layer <br />beneath the liner by approximately three percent over i.he operating <br />life of the pro,)ect. <br />In addition to permeation through the liner, there is a potential <br />for flaws in the liner which could ultimately conduct flow. These <br />flaws could be formed by tears, punctures, seam defects, etc. The <br />estimated seepage volume through these openings will be dependent <br />upon the permeability of the underlying material, the area of the <br />opening(s), and the frequency of the openings. For analysis purposes <br />it can be assumed that potential holes in the liner would be 10 mm~ <br />(radius - 1.78 mm) in size and would have a frequency of one hole <br />per acre. These values correspond to the EPA's evaluat on performed <br />in developing the "Draft Leak Detection Rule", assuming <br />implementation of a high level quality assurance program during <br />liner installation. <br />The permeability of the subsoils beneath the liner an<' the applied <br />head will control the volume of seepage. For the purposes of this <br />analysis, permeability of the compacted subsoils is es;imated to be <br />approximately 1 x 10~s cm/sec. The hydraulic head w~lich will be <br />applied to the liner will be minimized by the subdrain.age layer and <br />,;1p1ng. Given the permeability within the subdrainage layer, the <br />estimated head which could be applied will be about cne ft. Using <br />the assumptions presented the estimated seepage through each hole <br />is approximately 5.4 x 10-~ gpm. Tf~erefore, during final buildout at <br />an area of 16T acres (T.3 x 10" ftz) of impoundment, the total <br />estimated volume of seepage will be equivalent to 63.4 ft3/yr (474 <br />gallons per year). Cissipation of this flow will occur within the <br />subsoil of the site and will resu~t in an increase in moisture <br />content of the site subsoils. Over the entire tatlt~gs area the <br />effect would increase the moisture content of the comp~~cted subsoil <br />layer beneath the liner by significantly less than 0.01 percent <br />during operation of the project. At a specific flaw in the liner, <br />a volume of subsoil equivalent to 20 cu f*, could be imliacted during <br />the operating life of the project. <br />