My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-09_REVISION - M1988112 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-09_REVISION - M1988112 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 9:53:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:31:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/1990
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'90 01109 18s42 • $ 303 985 9947 SRK DENVE~ <br />6ATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, SAN LUIS PROJECT <br />CMLRD ADEQUACY LETTER RESPONSES <br />Page 22 of 2B <br />Concurrently with flow reduction of process related chemicals the <br />chemical makeup of the solution is anticipated to Change. Reduction <br />in free cyanide levels and a decrease in total dissolved solids is <br />anticipated through natural geochemlcal reactions. Precioitation on <br />the embankment will result in infiltration and subsequent drainage <br />from the embankment. Periodically, following rainfall events and <br />seasonally following snowmelt, an increase in flow from the drain <br />network will occur. This flow will reflect similar water quality to <br />the groundwater of the pro,~ect area. <br />As the drainage rate decreases the potential for leakage from the <br />liner system will also decrease, Both the source of seepage and the <br />hydraulic head applied to the liner will reduce. The long-term <br />potential of seepage is, therefore, less than the coperational <br />conditions discussed in Response 11. <br />Post reclamation infiltration over the surface of the facility is <br />predicted to be minimal, even following mador storm events. Routing <br />of storm water out of the facility will occur within a short period <br />following the storm. The bulk of infiltration is also anticipated <br />to be removed from the upper surface layer of the reclafined area by <br />the evapotranspiration process. No detectable effect of infiltration <br />over the facility's surface following reclamation is predicted. <br />Based upon the extremely low level of potential seepage or flow <br />predicted from the facility following reclamation, no modelling is <br />considered necessary. <br />40. The final topography on the tailings surface is described as being <br />created by selective deposition at the end of operations such thet <br />only minor grading 1s expected prior to topsoil placement and <br />revegetation. It is noted in Appendix L (Spillway Design <br />Calculations) that the reclamation p)an may spigot clean <br />material and seed, rather than using earth movers to grade the <br />surface." Please clarify the method proposed for topsoil distribution <br />and seeding on the tailings surface. <br />RESPONSE: The method proposed for topsoil distribution and seeding on the <br />tailings surface is, as described on pages E-3 and E-5, initially <br />selective deposition, followed 6y minor grading, and finally topsoil <br />placement and revegetation. The method described in Appendix L is <br />incorrect and has been deleted from the text. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.