My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-09_REVISION - M1988112 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-09_REVISION - M1988112 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 9:53:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:31:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/9/1990
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
90 01109 18:37 ~ S 303 985 9947 SRK DENVER OS <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, SAN LUIS PROJECT <br />CMLRD ADEQUACY LETTER RESPONSES <br />Page 19 of 28 <br />b. The current ditch design calls for a minimum ditch depth of <br />2 ft. The design flow would result in a flow depth of 1.5 ft <br />for ditches constructed at a grade of 1.5 percent <br />c. The diversion ditch design should be amended ttr a 2.5 ft <br />minimum depth to allow for one-ft of freeboard during the <br />design storm event. The redesigned ditch has a maximum capacity <br />of 70 cfs at a flow depth of 2.5 ft. Detail 2 of Figure C-8 <br />has been revised. <br />d. Under conditions of design discharge, flow in the diversion <br />ditches is subcritical in nature with a maximum velocity of <br />3.9 fps (feet per seconds). Reseeding of the ditches is <br />expected to provide sufficient erosion protection <br />35. A small area without upiand runoff controi exists between the east <br />and south diversions. How will runoff from this small ridge area <br />above the tailings be handled? <br />RESPONSE: Runoff from this small area will be routed into the south and east <br />diversions and have been included in the drainage area designs. A <br />small V ditch (approximately two ft in depth) will extend along the <br />upper tailings road/berm which will carry these flows into the <br />respective diversions. These ditches were not included in the design <br />since the area and associated are very small. <br />In addition, should the ditch breach, the flows can be easily handled <br />within the tailings disposal area (and have been included in the PMF <br />inflow calculations). <br />36. On page D-6] of the originai permit application, the statement is <br />made that details of the erosion protection/runoff control for the <br />mill site area wiil be provided upon completion of the mill design. <br />Nave these been developed and, if not, what is the expected timing <br />of this submittal? <br />RESPONSE: Detailed designs for runoff at the mill site area are currently being <br />completed. These designs will be completed following final approval <br />of the pending amendment and will be submitted prior to commencing <br />mill construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.