My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-12-22_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1989-12-22_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 9:22:38 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 5:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/22/1989
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW AMENDMANT 1 SAN LUIS PROJECT BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD FN M-88-112
From
MLRD
To
STEVE RENNER
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~ <br />'~ STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Roam 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Fn%:303 832-8106 <br />DATE: December 22, 1989 <br />T0: Steve Renner <br />FROM: John T. Doerfer <br />RE: Adequacy Review, Amendment No. 1, San Luis Protect <br />Battle Mountain Gold, File No. M-88-112 <br />of ~a~ <br />„~%`~8 <br />~ R <br />~ re 76 ~ <br />Roy Ramer, <br />Gorermr <br />Fretl R. Banra, <br />Division Director <br />As you requested, I have reviewed selected portions of the above-referenced <br />amendment application. My review concerned primarily the hydrologic aspects <br />of the plan. My comments following review are provided below: <br />D. 5 Mill Facilities <br />1. On page D-14, reference to a "dilute cyanide solution" is made in <br />discussing the carbon-in-leach method of ore processing. What is the <br />expected concentration of cyanide in this process solution? <br />2. On page D-16, reference is made to use of sulfuric acid in heating the <br />tailings slurry prior to disposal. An equilibrium diagram i:a provided to <br />indicate that 70% of the cyanide will be volatilized at pH = 9. What is <br />the expected concentration of free cyanide in the treated slurry solution? <br />3. The emergency response plan identifies 6,500 gallons of sulfuric acid as <br />being located on site. At expected production levels, what is the daily <br />requirement or consumption of sulfuric acid? Will sulfuric acid be used <br />as a detoxifying reagent in an emergency spill situation? <br />4. Hydrogen peroxide and alkaline chlorination are referenced for use in <br />the emergency response plan for cyanide detoxification. What reagent <br />will be used for alkaline chlorination? With reference to Table 4.1 in <br />the emergency response plan (Exhibit M), what volumes of reagents will <br />be available for detoxification purposes? What correspondin<q volumes of <br />spills will be detoxified by the amounts of reagents stored on site? <br />5. The results of the depositional modeling tests as to expected cyanide <br />concentrations in the tailings have not yet been submitted. As mentioned <br />on page D-29, this information should be submitted for incorporation in <br />the document review process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.