My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-06-15_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-06-15_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 6:21:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 4:36:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/15/1992
Doc Name
COMMENTS ON BMRS RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON TR6 SAMPLING & ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL PREPARED
To
PARCE MAURO HULTIN & SPAANSTRA PC
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />10. Comment answered. <br />PAGE-BY-PAGE COMMENTS <br />1. Comment answered. <br />2. Comment answered. <br />3. Comment answered. <br /> <br />4. The Division expects that RS-5 and RS-6, M-2, M-6, M-7, M-8, <br />and M-9 will be monitored bi-weekly. <br />5. Comment answered. <br />6. It appears that BMG did not understand the intent of this <br />comment, perhaps because of my imprecision. <br />Ordinarily, all sample bottles sent to labs should be <br />completely full. Anything less than a full bottle should <br />indicate to the lab either leakage or low sample avAilability. <br />The sampling protocol should account for the disposition of <br />partial samples, and make the lab responsible for ~hoting such <br />samples. If partial samples are to be supplied t1o the lab, <br />BMG should evaluate the probable effects on the analyses of <br />agitation, in air, during shipment. <br />Comment answered. <br />Comment answered. <br />9. The Division does not accept the response. If wafter of any <br />sort is found in a well that ordinarily does not contain <br />fluid, BMG should immediately investigate the prgblem. BMG <br />must develop an adequate protocol for addressing phis issue. <br />It is careless and unreasonable to assume that a laboratory <br />method should be deemed more important than a field <br />observation. BMG should know the compositions of fluids of <br />concern throughout the plant. BMG should be prepared to <br />identify the source of fluids found in a normally d;y sampling <br />station using methods that require only low volume$ of fluid. <br />If BMG needs assistance in devising such tests, tl~e Division <br />will provide it if requested. There are many trace element or <br />isotopic or other techniques that may be employed. <br />10. The Division does not accept the response. Fluid3 that fail <br />to provide consistent values on pH and conductivity meters do <br />so for logical reasons, not the least of which are faulty <br />meters, operator error, or inhomogeneous infiltration rates <br />into the sampling site. Would you pump a low-volute well dry <br />waiting for the indicators to stabilize? If your answer is <br />yes, is that reasonably protective of healtY~ and the <br />environment? This section must be re-addressed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.