My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-06-15_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-06-15_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 6:21:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 4:36:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/15/1992
Doc Name
COMMENTS ON BMRS RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON TR6 SAMPLING & ANALYTICAL PROTOCOL PREPARED
To
PARCE MAURO HULTIN & SPAANSTRA PC
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. III IIIIIIIIIIIII III - ~ <br />999 / ~ / A~~~ <br />June 15, 1992 , / ~ <br />Mssrs. Dean R. Massey and Mark N. Semenoff <br />Parcel, Mauro, Hultin and Spaanstra, P.C. <br />1801 California St Suite 3600 <br />Denver, co sozoz-6aoo h,~N IN : C~e1CYRfSP.LT(~ <br />RE: Comments on BMR's "Response to Adequacy Comments ooh Technical <br />Revision No. 006, Sampling and Analytical Protocol" Prepared <br />and received June 12, 1992; Battle Mountain Resdurces; San <br />Luis Project; Permit No. M-88-112. <br />Dear Mssrs. Massey and Semenoff: <br />The following are follow-up comments regarding the above cited <br />document. Comments are numbered according to you response <br />numbers. Upon receipt of adequate responses, the Divis~on will be <br />able to approve the Sampling and Analytical Protocol. <br />Regarding the choice of an "outside" independant lab to conduct the <br />monitoring, I have reviewed the SOQ of Water Waste and Land, Inc. <br />The SOQ appears to be current as of September, 1990. ~f you wish <br />for the Division to consider this company, you shoul¢i submit a <br />current SOQ, and in it specify the personnel and qualifications of <br />those who will be conducting the sampling. The choice of outside <br />party is not addressed by this letter. <br />COMMENTS: <br />1. Respondent has correctly identified my mistake; tq wit: RS-5 <br />is the station that should have been cited in this section. <br />BMG and its consultants have surmised, without supporting <br />data, that the groundwater gradient directly beneath the <br />tailings impoundments is westerly, on trend with tlhe surface <br />topography. Though reasonable, this in not proven. The <br />Division is concerned about the fate of any release from the <br />tailings ponds. Whether a release would flow into the Rito <br />Seco, the Culebra, or to groundwater unrelated to these <br />drainages is not known. <br />BMR needs to identify the likely fate of a potential release <br />from the tailings ponds and establish routine sampling in that <br />area. <br />2. The Division expects that once the hydrologic gradient in the <br />vicinity of the tailing ponds is established, an appropriate <br />number and appropriate types of sampling stations will be <br />established. <br />3. The Division expects that sample containers, reagents, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.