My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-05-13_REVISION - M1977342 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2003-05-13_REVISION - M1977342 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 4:31:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/13/2003
Doc Name
Pre-hearing conference notice and information
From
DMG
To
AM-4 Parties
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT PROCESS: <br />Upon receipt of an application, the Office makes an administrative determination <br />that the application contains sufficient information for the application to be <br />considered administratively filed. Once an application is considered filed, the <br />Office has 90 days to complete its adequacy review of the application and to make , <br />its decision to approve or deny the application. Any application denied by the <br />Office is automatically set for a Board hearing. During the adequacy review <br />process, the Office examines each Exhibit in the application to verify that all the <br />requirements far an E~:h~ibit, pursuant to the Act and Rules, have been adequately <br />addressed. Where inadequacies in an Exhibit exist, the Office sends an adequacy <br />letter to the Applicant requesting that the inadequacies identified by the Office be <br />addressed. <br />Where. there are no objections to an application, only the Applicant may extend the <br />application review process beyond the 90`~ day decision date. If an application is <br />not adequate, and the decision date is not extended by the Applicant, the Office <br />may deny the application. Extensions beyond the 90`~ day decision date may not <br />extended past 365 days from the date the application was considered filed. If an <br />application reaches the 365`" day, and Office adequacy issues remain, the <br />application may be scheduled for a Board hearing to approve or deny.the <br />application. <br />If the Office receives an objection to an application, the application is <br />automatically set for a Boazd hearing. Once the Office makes a finding that an <br />application is filed, the Board must make its decision to approve or deny the <br />application by the I20`s day, unless the Applicant extends the decision date. <br />Again, the extension may not exceed 365 days beyond the filing date. <br />Provisions of the Act require that an application be automatically approved if <br />the office does not make a decision on the application by the 90's day, or by <br />the Board, where a timely objection is received, by the 120' day, unless those <br />dates are extended or waived by the Applicant. <br />In the case where an application is set for a Board hearing (the Office receives a <br />written objection within the public comment period), the Office must hold a Pre- <br />heating Conference within 30 days after the close of the public comment period. <br />(You should review the provisions of Rules 2.7.1, and 2.7.2 (attached) which <br />explain the Pre-hearing Conference and process.) Where an objection is received <br />prior to the close of the public comment period, the Office must makes its <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.