My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-18_REVISION - M1988112 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-18_REVISION - M1988112 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 10:16:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 4:14:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/18/1990
Doc Name
SAN LUIS PERMIT AMENDMENT ADEQUACY RESPONSES
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC. <br />ADEQUACY RESPONSES - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <br />PAGE 5 OF 7 <br />review and approval as required by Section 1.6 of the Mineral Rules and <br />Regulations. <br />31. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />32. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, ]990 submittal. <br />33. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />34. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />35. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />36. Please commit to providing a map showing the drainage layout at ]east 30 <br />days prior to mill construction. <br />The complete drainage layout and designs will be submitted for approval <br />at least 30 days prior to commencing construction of the mill facilities. <br />37. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />38. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />39. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />40. The comment was satisfactorily addressed in the January 9, 199D submittal. <br />41. The comment was satisfactori]y addressed in the January 9, 1990 submittal. <br />42. Please provide a map delineating the drainage areas referred to as Area <br />1 through Area 5. Please provide additional Clarification on why the 100 <br />year 24 hour storm event was used to determine velocities. T'he Division <br />suggests that parabolic channels be constructed instead of V-shaped <br />channels to approximate the naturai channels in the area. Please commit <br />to monitoring the channels for sediment build-up or erosion to ensure that <br />the channels are functioning properly. <br />Figure E-2 is provided to delineate the drainage areas 1 through 5 on the <br />reclaimed tailings surface. <br />The velocities presented in the response were actual velocities for the <br />2 year 24 hour storm event and not the 100 year 24 hour event indicated <br />in the response. <br />BMR has designed V-shaped channels to keep the channel area as small as <br />possible as an aid in maintaining as consistent a velocity with varying <br />flows across the tailings as possible to help prevent sediment deposition. <br />Parabolic channels will result in varying channel velocities and subject <br />to flow may result in deposition and subsequent remobilization of sediment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.