My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-07-20_REVISION - M1977403HR
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977403
>
2005-07-20_REVISION - M1977403HR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:45:43 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:55:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977403HR
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/20/2005
Doc Name
development characterization
From
idarado mining company
To
dmg
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bill Lyle, /darado Mining Company <br />June 16, 1005 <br />Page 2 <br />Acid-base accounting (ABA) tests were performed to characterize the net neutralization potential (NNP), <br />acid generation potential (AGP), and acid neutralizing potential (ANP) of the material contained in the <br />repository. The results of the ABA tests are summarized in this Technical Memorandum. <br />Sample Collection and Analysis <br />Twenty soil samples were collected at various representative locations along the repository on September <br />21, 2004 by MFG, Inc. The samples were collected at regularly spaced horizontal and vertical intervals to <br />characterize the soil contained within the repository. The repository was constructed by end-dumping of <br />the mixed soiUmine and mill-related materials from trucks along a central haul ramp that progressed in <br />elevation as the repository was constructed. Given the mixing of the soils and mine and mill-related <br />materials that occurred during excavation and repository construction, the materials are believed to be <br />uniformly distributed throughout the repository and the bulk of the materials contained within the <br />repository are represented by the samples collected at the horizontally and vertically spaced intervals. <br />The sampling of the repository surface was conducted to examine the materials final placement within the <br />repository and not to prejudice the geochemical nature of the stockpile construction due to the manner in <br />which the materials were mixed during excavation and placement. Therefore, the stockpile sampling was <br />completed to examine the materials geochemical nature in final placement rather independent material <br />characterizations (i.e., tailing, native soils, and waste rock) from the excavated surface. <br />The locations of the samples collected within the repository are shown on Figure 1. Samples were <br />collected on a grid along north-south trending lines spaced 30, 110, 190, and 240 feet east of the <br />southwestem corner of the repository, and along east-west trending lines located 30, 60, 90, and 120 feet <br />from the southwestern comer of the repository. Four additional samples were collected on the eastern <br />slope face of the repository. Samples were collected between 10 and 65 feet above the base of the <br />repository (Figure 1). Samples were collected from zero to six inches in depth. Since removal activities <br />had not been completed at the Gold Run Mill at the time of sampling, four additional samples were <br />collected from areas being excavated at the Gold Run Mill on September 22, 2004. The samples were <br />collected [o a depth of six inches at the locations shown on Figure 2. <br />The soil samples were submitted to SVL Analytical, Inc. for ABA analysis. The ABA analysis was <br />preformed in accordance with the Modified Sobek Method using EPA Method 600. The sulfur forms <br />(non-extractable sulfur, pyritic sulfur, sulfate-sulfur, and total sulfur) were analyzed using a Leco SC-132 <br />Automatic Sulfur Determinator. The AGP is calculated based on only the total pyritic sulfur content. <br />ABA Test Results <br />The ABA test results for the 24 samples are provided in Table 1. The NNP is detertnined by subtracting <br />the AGP from the ANP. A negative NNP value (or an ANP/AGP ratio less than 1) indicates that a <br />potential exists for the soil to form acid. On the other hand, samples with a positive NNP value are <br />considered alkaline in nature and predicted to have a reduced potential to produce acid. Geochemically, it <br />is believed NNP values greater than 20 (or ANP/AGP ratios greater than 3) are considered unlikely to <br />generate acid. <br />As shown in Table 1, the sample materials demonstrated relatively low acid generation potential (AGP <br />range of 0.9 to 20.0, a mean concentration of 5.9, and a median concentration of 5.3 tons CaC03/1000 <br />tons) and considerable neutralization potential (ANP range of 9.9 to 71.3, a mean concentration of 30.5, <br />and a median concentration of 29.5 tons CaC03/1000 tons). All samples had a positive NNP value except <br />for one sample. The NNP sample values range from -8.1 to 65.1 tons CaCO}/1000 tons with ANP/AGP <br />ratios ranging from 0.6 to 22.4. The average NNP value for all 24 samples is 24.6 tons CaC03/1000 tons <br />P:000]I SNliiiga~bn\ABA t wing-Final.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.