My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE38057
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE38057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:52 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:53:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/26/1991
Doc Name
TEN DAY NOTICE 91-02-116-5 TV3 FRUITA 1 AND 2 MINES AMERICAN SHIELD COAL CO
From
OSM
To
MLRD
Violation No.
TD1991020116005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . <br />/~ Mr. Steven G. Renner 3 <br />which is not allowable under the approved Colorado Regulatory Program. <br />MI.RD's response further states, "This portion of the reduction will be <br />rescinded." <br />30 CFR 842.11(b)(1)(ii)(B)(4) authorizes OSM to find the State's response <br />to be good cause for not taking action at this time if the regulatory <br />authority requires a reasonable and specified time to determine if a <br />violation of the State program exists. As noted in MLRD's response, MLRD <br />proposes to review the bond adjustment and rescind that part of the <br />decision which involved credit for reclamation work completed. AFO is <br />granting MLRD an additional 15 days from receipt of this letter to complete <br />its review of the 1990 bond adjustment (reduction) decision, take <br />appropriate action as required by the approved Colorado Regulatory Program, <br />and notify AFO, in writing, of its actions. At that time, AFO will <br />consider the information presented and will make a finding as to the <br />appropriateness of MI.RD's response to part 2 of 3 of the TDN. <br />AFO finds MLRD's issuance of Notice of Violation C-91-007 in response to <br />part 3 of 3 of the TDN to constitute an appropriate response. <br />If you disagree with these findings, you may request an informal review in <br />accordance with 30 CFR B42.11(b)(1)(ii)(A). <br />Sincerely, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.