My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37874
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:44 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:48:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/14/1991
Doc Name
NEW ELK MINE PN C-81-012 TEN DAY LETTER X-91-02-370-003 TV 4
From
MLRD
To
WYOMING FUEL CO
Violation No.
TD1991020370003TV4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-35fi7 <br />FA X: 303 832.8106 <br />May 14, 1991 <br />tdr. Stuart Francone, <br />Environmental Coordinator <br />New Elk Mine <br />Wyoming Fuel Company <br />10250 Highway No. 12 <br />Weston, CO 81091 <br />Re: New Elk Mine (Permit C-81-012) <br />Ten Day Letter X-91-02-370-003 TV 4 <br />Dear Mr. Francone: <br />pF~/' ~CO=Q <br />'~~" Y'BF~~s <br />Ne ~ 8 <br />• '~, <br />~ VB 76 ~ <br />RoY Romer. <br />Governor <br />Fred R. Banta. <br />Division Director <br />Attached is a copy of the Division's response dated May 3, 1991 to Issue 3 <br />of 4 within the Ten Day Letter (TDL) referenced above. Although, the <br />Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) has not conveyed their finding to the Division <br />in regard to that response, the Division does feel it mist follow thru on the <br />commitment made. Consequently, the Division is requesting that Wyoming Fuel <br />provide by June 5, 1991, an MR proposing that the areas mentioned under <br />Issue 3 of 4 not already designated as exempt from normal surface control <br />measures be so approved and providing the demonstrations necessary under <br />Rule 4.05,2(3) so that such approvals may be made. While the Division is not <br />completely certain that such actions will address all AFO concerns, such <br />action and approvals would appear to the Division to be an acceptable and <br />necessary way to address apparent deficiencies in sediment control measures <br />approved for these areas. <br />If you have any questions, please call. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />James C. Stevens <br />Senior Reclamation Specialist <br />JCS/ern °'~'"° °""`' <br />~~ lb yP 1V Ae.4 <br />Enclosure(s) z <br />a <br />D s m °"`'J I <br />'+ L_1' <br />X47, r <br />.f ?~ Gf^ <br />",'u <br /> <br />5538E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.