Laserfiche WebLink
CASTLE ROCK CONSULTTKG, LLC <br />536 EAST 2ND AVENUE CASTLE ROCK, CO 80108 VOICE (303) 66D-8603 FAX (303) 663-5117 <br />EMAII. STANPETERSPEQAOL.COM <br />October 7, 2004 <br />Ms. Connie N. Davis <br />Aggregate Industries, <br />PO Box 337231 <br />Greeley, CO 80633 <br />Deaz Ms. Davis, <br />As requested, I am summarizing the design basis for sizing the groundwater mitigation <br />system pipelines for the Stegner mine in Fort Collins, Colorado. I understand that this <br />information was requested by the Colorado Division of Mina;rals and Geology, and this <br />letter will be included in your Response to Adequacy of the Technical Revision Request <br />for the reclamation of this property. <br />To determine the size of the upstream groundwater mitigation pipe, I first estimated the <br />amount of groundwater that would have normally flowed though the sand and gravel, <br />north to south across the property. With permeabilities of 11~ 1 to lE-2 cm/sec, the <br />average fall of 5.5 feet over 1300LF, I estimated natural flows of 0.3 to 3 gpm. This <br />assumes an interception depth of six inches (thus preventing any groundwater mounding) <br />over approximately 1000 feet east to west. The six inch pipe size along the north <br />alignment of 1200LF, falling O.Sft, should convey 44gpm. 7ihe excess capacity would <br />convey additional groundwater, during times of heavy rainf~dl, etc. While the perforated <br />pipe along the western alignment of the groundwater interceptor system will add water to <br />convey, the efficiency of the same pipe diameter will be much greater, due to the steeper <br />gradient (approximately four times steeper). The solid pipe along the southern alignment <br />has an even greater slope. The invert elevations were chosen to intercept groundwater at <br />elevations at historic pre-slurry wall conditions, and release this water along the south- <br />eastern area, outside the slurry wall perimeter, where a depression of groundwater levels <br />has occurred. These flow-rates do not even account for increased flow through the 1-1/2" <br />gravel surrounding the perforated pipes. <br />Please feel free to call if you have any questions, or need additional assistance. <br />As ever`~~ / <br />/~ <br />Stan Peters, P.E. <br />