My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37798
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37798
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:41 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:45:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/24/2005
Doc Name
Notice of Proposed Amount of Civil Penalty
From
DMG
To
Bowie Resources LLC
Violation No.
CV2005002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Bowie Resources LLC /The Bowie No. 2 Mine <br />DMG Permit No. C-96-083 / NOV CV-2005-002 <br />February 24, 2005 <br />Reviewed: DMG NOV (2/1/05); Jim Stover Letter (2/8/05) re NOV abatement extension; DMG NOV <br />Modification and Extension Forms (2111lOS); Memo (2(22/OS) from Joe Dudash containing 1119/05 aerial <br />photo and Certified Coal Mine Waste Bank Insp Report - 4t° Q 2004 (dated 2/14/05) from Jim Stover. <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />No NOVs have been issued at this mine during the 12 months preceding the issuance of this NOV. <br />The History component is therefore proposed to be set at $0. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.04.5(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed assessment may range from $0 to $1750. The amount <br />proposed depends upon whether the violation was one of performance requirements or one of <br />administrative requirements. This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />Tn the case of a violation of performance requvements, the amount to be assessed for Seriousness <br />depends upon (1) the probability of the occurrence of the event which a violated standazd is <br />designed to prevent, and (2) the duration and extent of the potential or actual damage in terms of <br />azea and impact on the public or environment. <br />(1) The event (failure to appropriately and in a timely mawer demonstrate that construction of a <br />coal mine waste pile utilizing waste both in the pile and as-yet to be generated would achieve <br />a 1.5 factor of safety) that Permit Stipulation No. 16 was intended to prevent did in fact occur. <br />(2) Based upon comments by Division staff and a consulting registered professional engineer, it <br />appears that no potential or actual damage to the public or environment was created. <br />The Seriousness component of this assessment is therefore proposed to be set at $250. <br />Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments of "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of "negligence" may range from $250 to $150. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />It appears that this violation occurred as a result of a moderate degree of negligence. While a <br />geotechnical report was submitted addressing the engineering requirements of Stipulation No. 16, <br />it was submitted after a portion of the waste pile exceeded the established height ]imitation. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at $500. <br />Good Faith in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />This NOV has not yet been abated. <br />Good faith credit is therefore not proposed at this time. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $750. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.