My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37753
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37753
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:39 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:44:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
CASTLES EXHIBIT AND WITNESS LIST
Violation No.
MV1989015
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L • • <br />were produced. However, without closer examination of the rocks themselves and the <br />slope it could not be determined whether the rocks were in fact recent or were due <br />to older rock falls Trom surraund~ng cliffs. <br />The next stage of the investigation involved a detailed examination of the <br />drainage from the Phase ] mining limit boundary to the bottom of 4lilliams Canyon. <br />This was accomplished by climbing down the drainage and photographing the various <br />rocks, examining existing vegetation and vegetation regrowth around the rocks, <br />comparing light colored with dark colored rocks, and noting other points which could <br />provide an approximate date as to when the rocks arrived at their location. <br />Near the top of the drainage a number of moderate to large rocks were noted <br />just below the mining limit but at least 200 feet inside the permit boundary. These <br />rocks were already kno.,n to exist and when Phase 1 nears completicn it was planned <br />to remove these rocks and any trees which had died as a result of damage. One very <br />large, old rock (indicated by the dark gray color and the grass growing in cracks) <br />on the side of the hill was noted to have a drill hole in the Sider of it. However, <br />the dimensions of the hole was too small to have been produced by Castle Concrete. <br />Therefore, it appeared this large rock had fallen to this location during previous <br />mining, probably during the 1930's when excavations occurred abovea this area. 1t <br />became clear, as a result of this find, that at least three elassers of rocks w~xald <br />be found. <br />The first class would be boulders which had naturally fallen from cliffs as a <br />result of weathering. The second class of rocks weld be those wf~ich had originated <br />from the old mining operation. The third class of rocks were those which had more <br />recently fallen into the drainage as a result of mining in Phase L. These three <br />classes would need to be distinguished in order to classify the r~x ks in the <br />drainage and determine the extent of the recent spillage, which b:~ this point in the <br />investigation was realized to be likely, to at least some extent. <br />Further down the drainage, five large rocks which had come from the Phase 1 <br />area were noted. As judged by the color, these rocks were of regent origin and, as <br />shown by small disturbances in the soils above each rock location, it could be <br />determined that they had come it om the Phase 1 area. H7wever, as shover, by the lack <br />of anything more than minor damage to the soils and hillside vegetation, it became <br />apparent therse rocks had been rolling rather sl wly. Cne rock was rolling so slowly <br />it became lodged partially underneath a rack of comparable size wnich had been there <br />1 mg enough to develop grass in cracks and even a small shrub growing out the top of <br />the rock. All but two of these rocks were noted as being totally within the permit <br />COf3~CTIVE A,TICN PLAN SNYDc-R ROCK 4ILL5 PAS 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.