My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37682
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37682
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:36 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/22/1986
Doc Name
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR NOV C-86-022 MARR STRIP MINE
From
MLRD
To
KERR COAL CO
Violation No.
CV1986022
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUSTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR <br />NOV C-86-022 <br />NOV C-86-022 was written for "failure to adequately monitor ground water <br />monitoring sites as per the Regulations and the approved permit". As reported <br />in Kerr Coal Company's Annual Hydrologic Report (AHR), hydrologic monitoring <br />data was not available from two bedrock wells and one alluvial well. Steve <br />Renner explained that two wells, AO-2 and DH-4, had been damaged by cattle and <br />at Well 79-26 the casing was broken which prevented the collection of water <br />quality data. This was written as an administrative violation. <br />Kerr Coal Company contested the fact of the violation, The missing data and <br />the causes for it had been discussed in the AHR and solutions were proposed to <br />remedy the problem this spring/summer, Additionally, the operator questioned <br />whether they were obligated to insure the wells would not be disturbed. They <br />explained it is not feasible to guarantee there will be no stock or other type <br />of damage. <br />I feel a violation did occur, Although the operator was diligent in <br />identifying and reporting the missing information, data was missing from the <br />wells since April, 1984 for AO-2, since October, 1984 for DH-4 and since 1981 <br />for the water quality data at Well 79-76. It is the operator's responsibility <br />to maintain wells on a timely basis so that the water monitoring plan can be <br />conducted as approved in the permit. Therefore, when stock damage occurs the <br />damaged well should be repaired as soon thereafter as possible to prevent <br />disruption of the monitoring plan. If damage to a well occurs that will cause <br />a disruption to the monitoring plan, it should be reported immediately to the <br />Division, In this case damage was not reported until at least fourteen(14) <br />months after the fact. <br />The proposed civil penalty was: <br />History S 0,00 <br />Seriousness 100.00 <br />Fault 0.00 <br />Good Faith 0.00 <br />TOTAL ~G <br />History <br />No previous NOVs <br />Seriousness <br />There was some loss of data from these wells and the Division's ability to <br />assess hydrologic impacts has been slightly hindered, I agree with the <br />proposed penalty. <br />Fault <br />I agree with the proposed penalty. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.