My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37649
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37649
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:34 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/3/2002
Doc Name
Settlement Agreement
From
DMG
To
Picketwire Processing LLC
Violation No.
CV2002010
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
After hearing this testimony and considering the evidence presented, I have come to the <br />following conclusions: <br />HisiON <br />A $0.00 penalty is appropriate for history. <br />Seriousness <br />I believe that the described failure in water sampling reporting and frequency is insignificant and <br />would justify a $0.00 penalty. <br />Fault <br />I believe that fault is low and would justify a penalty of $250.00. This was an unintentional <br />misunderstanding primarily in the level of frequency of sampling and reporting. However, as <br />Kent pointed out, there are only 2 levels of frequency for collection and reporting, not 3. The <br />Company and the Division are now in sync with the appropriate schedule. <br />Number of Days Penalty Assessed <br />I concur with 1 day. <br />Good Faith. <br />I concur with the Assessment Officer that good faith is not warranted. <br />Settlement Agreement Penalty <br />History $0.00 <br />Seriousness $0.00 <br />Fault $250.00 <br />Number of Days Penalty Assessed 1 <br />Good Faith $0.00 <br />Total Penalty $250.00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.