My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37454
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37454
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:26 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:33:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/11/1992
Doc Name
VIOLATIONS C-92-013 014 019 020 & 021
From
GREG LEWICKI & ASSOCIATES
To
MLRD
Violation No.
CV1992020
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w ", <br />CHAPTER'ilVO HYDROLOGIC PRINCIPLES 83 <br />:he runoff poten- treatment combinations. Outer similar tables are available in various <br />ous land use and ,:I references (Soil Conservation Service, 1972). Impervious areas and" <br />water surfaces are assigned a CN of 98-100. Recognizing that abstrac- <br />aburban, and Urban .E~ lions from rainfall depend on the antecedent conditions that exist <br />~~ at the time a rainstorm occurs, three antecedent conditions are de- <br />::~c[c sott. snow fined as in Table 2.21. The curve numbers given in Table 2.20 are <br />c o for antecedent condition II. To convert to antecedent condition I <br />st ea 91 or III, the factors given in Table 2.22 may be used. Antecedent con- <br />s re at 'p dition I is used when there has been little rainfall preceding the <br />1 rainfall in question and condition III is used where there has been <br />t9 ~ e9 _ considerable rainfall prior to the rain in question. <br />5y 7Y BO .. <br />se Tr re :ai Originally [he CN values were assigned by plotting observed <br />runoff versus measured rainfall for a number of experimental plots <br />~ " s7 scattered throughouC the U.S. The CN's were then cortelated with <br />ss ro Tr <br />- land use. Again, note that the CN approach is a runoff approach and <br />;' not an infiltration approach. Certainly infiltration is a factor, but <br />u rY eo so is quick return flow and initial abstractions. Combining the CN <br />6" r9 ev approach with infiltration approaches such as minimum retention <br />n 9~ 9s rates carries the CN concept beyond it original intent and beyond <br />the data on which the CN's are based. <br />W 9] 97 <br /> Table 2.'_ I Definition of Antecedent Condition. <br />es 90 9z 5-Day Antecedent Rainfall <br />n e7 Bt in inches <br />n ai e6 Dormant Growing <br />a eo es Condition Genera! Descripnon Season Season <br />se n eY <br /> 1 Optimum soil condition from about lower c OS < 1.3 <br />i 9e 9e 9e plants Gmit to wilting point <br /> I I Average value for annual floods 0.5 - I.I 1.4 - =. I <br />I 9e 9B 9B <br />es e9 9s 11I Heavy rainfall or light rainfall and low tempera- > I.I > ~.1 <br />z e3 Br B9 lures within $ days prior to [he given storm <br /> <br />~~ Rrff t 0 <br />"~- "ra' Once the proper CN is obtained, equations 2.38 and 2.39 can <br />"1' be used to estimate the accumulated rainfall excess as a function <br />m aes...v <br />a.. •~ 1-~ <br />of total accumu]ated rainfall. Figure 2.26 has been prepared to sim- <br />dT~o, sma, tlo~ Plify [he solution of equation 2.38. Curve numbers for complex areas <br /> can be calculated by a weighting procedure with the weighting factor <br />:..a. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.