Laserfiche WebLink
taking any additional action at this time." Tr., 103; Ex. No. G- <br />13. <br />On May 25, 1994, OSM conducted a follow-up inspection. Tr., <br />112. The inspection was attended by AFO Inspectors Ra*_hbun and <br />Russell Porter and representatives of Kerr. Tr., 112-13. DMG <br />declined to participate in the inspection. Tr., 113, 157. <br />During the May 25 inspection, Inspectors Rathbun and Porter <br />observed that the ridge in Pit No. 1 had not been restored to <br />AOC, as required by section 4.14.1(2) of the Colorado program. <br />Tr., 113, 166-70, 188-91. Accordingly, Inspector Porter issued <br />the NOV "for failure to return the Federal lands portion of the <br />disturbed area in Pit #`1 to its AOC ." Ex. No. G-16 <br />(inspection report narrative at 4); see also Tr., 189-91, 206-07; <br />Ex. Nos. G-7, G-15, G-20. <br />II. <br />THE HOARD BHOOLD AFFIRIi ALJ CHILD'S JULY 22, 199, <br />DECISION DENYING E$TENDED TEMPORARY RELIEF. <br />Under SMCRA § 525(c), an applicant for review of an <br />enforcement notice or order may request temporary relief from the <br />Secretary pending the completion of administrative review. <br />Section 525(c) provides further that <br />[tlhe Secretarv may rg ant such relief, under suc <br />conditions as he ma prescribe, if-- <br />(1) a hearing has been held in the locality of <br />the permit area on the request for temporary <br />relief in which all parties were given an <br />opportunity to be heard; <br />7 <br />