My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37350
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37350
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:31:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/15/1991
Doc Name
PN C-82-056 FOIDEL CREEK MINE
From
OSM
To
MLRD
Violation No.
TD1991020244006TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~ <br /> <br />iii iiiiiiiii m <br /> <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING ~ <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT ~) I~~ ~ ~ <br />625 SILVERI AVENUE, S. W. ~ ~ (/ ~ ~ \/ ~ftMCeply Refer To: <br />ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87102 <br />April 11, 1991 <br />APR 1 5 1991 <br />Mined Land <br />faeciamation Division <br />Permit: C-82-056 <br />Mine Name: Foidel Creek <br />Mr. Steve Renner, Coal Program Supervisor <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1413 Sherman Street <br />Denver, N 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />Federal Ten-Day Notice 91-02-244-6 & 7 is being issued for <br />violations that likely existed at the time of the last State complete <br />inspection (LSCI). Specific details are as follows: <br />Date of Federal Inspection: 3/28/91 Date of LSCI: 1/29/91 <br />'Ihe determination that the State did not cite the violation(s) is based <br />on one or rrore of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />~~~sign criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection <br />(sedirrent pond, excess spoil fill, etc.) #6 <br />-Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last State <br />complete inspection have not been established (diversion ditches, <br />sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, etc.) <br />x Site conditions indicate that the violation(s) noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete <br />inspection. #7 <br />Other (Give explanation). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.