Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />• 13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 I <br />23 <br />24 <br />w• 25 <br /> <br />you're talY.ing about, it was the active side of the pit, <br />right? We're still working on it. Well, we can't very <br />well slope it until we get further back and get more over- <br />burden, and then cve will have something to work with to <br />slope it. <br />MR. LOYE: That's true. <br />}1R. I:ORINEE:: The area that has been worked <br />is sloped flat. We're not digging in; we're just taking <br />the hill off. And, as I'm doing that, I'm reclaiming -- <br />I have pictures I can show you. <br />MR. LOPE: I think my slides, if I may add, <br />illustrated basically the same thing: That the mining <br />activity reduces it to the level of the road and the <br />1E <br />staging area, and that reclamation would consist of again <br />sloping and planning, sloping of the highwalls and planning <br />of the entire area. <br />Nov, the question of is there environmental <br />damage disturbs me in that that is not a black-and-white <br />question. I can tell you that this is what exists. It <br />must be reclaimed. There is no imminent harm that has <br />occurred by the operation anymore than any other simple, <br />fairly simple, gravel pit as we are discussing. So I'm <br />not quite sure I can answer your question. <br />MR. 7.ALKZfdD: Davis, I've got no objection <br />to the Board's lowering it. It's, as the recommendation <br />1. llFN (il. I'F \I/F'S AS.b )f NII 1. !\( <br />('r.nlo-~l Shunhmel Hrpunr.. <br />/500 ('hem rJl. HuaJ <br />l.~r drn m. Columd.. X011/ <br />i' <br />