My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37165
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37165
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:15 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:25:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/11/1992
Doc Name
VIOLATIONS C-92-013 014 019 020 & 021
From
GREG LEWICKI & ASSOCIATES
To
MLRD
Violation No.
CV1992014
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />CHAPTER TWO HYDROLOGIC PRINCIPLES 83 <br />'.he runoff poten- treatment combinations. Other similar tables are available in various <br />ous land use and ,.~ references (Soil Conservation Service, 1972). Impervious azeas and' <br />water surfaces are assigned a CN of 98-100. Recognizing that abstrac- <br />uburban, and Urban .4~ lions from rainfall depend on the antecedent conditions that exist <br />i{ at the time a rainstorm occurs, three antecedent conditions are de- <br />~1C 501L G101P `.` fined as in Table 2.21. The curve numbers given in Table 2.20 are <br />e c n j for antecedent condition II. To convert to antecedent condition 1 <br />at ee 91 - or [I1, the factors given in Table 2.22 may be used. Antecedent con- <br />Tl Te e1 dition I is used when there has been little rainfall preceding the <br />tainfall in question and condition IiI is used where there has been <br />r9 ab e9 considerable rainfall prior to the rain in question. <br />4 T4 80 j: <br />se Tt re at Originally the CN values were assigned by plotting observed <br />runoff versus measured rainfall For a number of experimental plots <br />ee TT ea scattered throughout the U.S. The CN's were then correlated with <br />55 TC TT <br />land use. Again, note that the CN approach is a runoff approach and <br />-' not an infiltration approach. Certainly infiltration is a factor, but <br />~ T4 eo so is quick return Flow and initial abstractions. Combining the CN <br />~ 79 04 approach with infiltration approaches such as minimum retention <br />{ 9z 94 9s rates carries the CN concept beyond it original intent and beyond <br />1 the data on which the CN's are based. <br />' e3 91 9] <br />{ I Table ?.'_ I Definition of Antecedent Condition. <br />es 90 9z 5-Day Antecedent Rainfall <br />Ts as eT in inches <br />rz e1 e6 Dormant Growing <br />n so es Condition General Description Season Season <br />6e T9 B4 <br /> 1 Optimum soil condition from about lower < 0.5 < 1.4 <br />B 9a ye 9e plants limit to wilting point <br /> 11 Average value (or annual hoods 0.5 - I.1 1.4 - ?. I <br />s 9e 9e 9a <br />ey eq yr 111 Heavy rainfall or light rainfall and low tempera- > I.I > ?.1 <br />2 e2 BT e9 lures within 5 days prior [o the given storm <br />yv~ nrer co <br />"- 1911' Once the proper CN is obtained, equations 2.38 and 2.39 can <br />~'- be used to estimate the accumulated rainfall excess as a function <br />R Y4w~Y <br />m+r^ 1wu of total accumulated rainfall. Figure 2.26 has been prepared to sim- <br />.,~4,0. cmaT:tai Plify the solution of equation 2.38. Curve numbers for complex areas <br />can be calculated by a weighting procedure with the weighting factor <br />~ ..e. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.