Laserfiche WebLink
~'~~~--- - ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />` kern coal company <br />one taoor centx • sues 2500 (3031623-8317 <br />1200 sewrteenth 51f9e1 • d9rr~er, colIX2d0 80202 Iwu 9 t 0-931.2561 <br />March 12, 1988 <br />REC~1~/E~ <br />Mr. Steven G. Renner <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Colorado Mined Laad Reclamation Division MAR 171986 <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman street MINED I,gNp ~~La~ATiG~1 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 G010. Ddpl. Of t~ati~fel Aeaaurcb6 <br />Re: Responses to MLRD Review of 1985 Annual <br />j~ydrolo~,y Report - Your File Number C-006-80 <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />This letter is written to address your February 25, 1986 <br />letter concerning your review of our 1985 Annual Hydrology Report <br />(Permit No. C-006-80). <br />First, I xould point out that the 1985 report is the most <br />comprehensive and conclusive report which has ever been prepared <br />for the Marr Mine. I found it interesting that it is also the <br />only annual hydrology report which has stimulated a review and <br />subsequent comment letter from the Colorado Mined Land Reclama- <br />tion Division. It is our firm conviction that all aspects of a <br />permit and its compliance measures should be dealt with in an <br />honest and straight-forward manner as our past record shows. <br />However, it is rather frustrating when, as we endeavor to be more <br />thorough and provide better reporting and evaluation of data, we <br />can expect to receive letters like yours of Februazy 25, 1986, <br />which identify concerns and demand remedial actions, responses <br />and deadlines for items that would otherwise have gone unnoticed. <br />We, nevertheless, plan to continue improving our reporting and <br />permit compliance efforts and trust that the same will, in the <br />future, stimulate a cooperative alliance between Kerr Coal <br />Company and the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division. <br />Your letter identified four specific concerns which are ad- <br />dressed in a "Comment-Response" format below: <br />1. Comment: Data <br />indicates that this well <br />between January 1981 and <br />the "720" pit, however, <br />pit have been observed. <br />the pit? <br />from overburden completion Well 79-2 <br />has lost approximately 20 feet of head <br />March 1985. Well 79-2 is adjacent to <br />the text indicates that no inflows to the <br />Where is this water being lost to if not <br />