My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-02-07_REVISION - M1976020 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976020
>
2002-02-07_REVISION - M1976020 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:49:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:21:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976020
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/7/2002
Doc Name
Amendment Application
From
Oldcastle SW Group Inc dba Four Corners Materials
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thomas pit is located between Miles 81.4 and 81.5 markers in the River. Six cross sections on this <br />stretch of the river have been monitored since 1995. These are called 4+09, 9+93, 14+68, 17+39, <br />24+96, and 27+54. These cross sections are shown in plan view on Map Exhibit C-3. The cross-sec- <br />tions are shown on Map C-3. These cross sections will be re-surveyed on a yearly basis and a report <br />will be made of the results. The report will be submitted to both the US Army COE and the CDMG <br />office in Durango. <br />The current lease with the landowners lasts until March of 2021. River mining is planned until this <br />date under the parameters described above. Since this is a highly aggrading area from a river leav- <br />ing an extremely rugged mountain area, as demonstrated in the Wright McLaughlin study (1981), <br />this area is actually more stable with carefully planned extraction. If extraction does not occur, de- <br />position of large amounts of gravel will continue to build up and raise the level of the river above <br />the surrounding floodplain. When a large flood occurs, it would cause more damage and could <br />change the river location. 13y limited extraction to a stable grade, the river will stay within a much <br />more limited area and will not threaten outside areas to the same degree during a flood. This was <br />also the conclusion of the technical personnel who wrote the 1998 DMG study [itledIn-Stream <br />Aggregate Extraction and Reclamation Guidance Document.This area and the OurayjRidgeway <br />area on the Uncompaghre River are two prime examples of a highly aggrading river areas in Colo- <br />rado that should be permitted to mine under controlled conditions. <br />2. To r~soil Handling for River Mining <br />Approximately 4750 cubic yards of topsoil has been salvaged and stockpiled from a portion of the <br />plant and yard area and is stored along the west boundary of the permit, adjacent to the irrigation <br />ditch. Much of this yard area has little topsoil available. Certain substitute soils may exist below <br />portions of the stockpile areas and can be used for reclamation. Also, since portions of these areas <br />will remain for commercial use, less topsoil will be needed for reclamation. No topsoil or overbur- <br />den is involved in the river harvesting, since all materials and sand and gravel alluvial material. No <br />soil will be needed to reclaim the river channel itself. As explained in the reclamation plan, this top- <br />soil will be used to restore part of the yard area to irrigated pasture use. <br />Thomas Pit 2/02 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.