My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37010
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:09 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:21:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/11/2007
Doc Name
Notice of Proposed Amount of Civil Penalty
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Violation No.
CV2007002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Seneca Coal Company /The Seneca II-W Mine <br />NOV CV-2007-002 <br />June 8, 2007 <br />Information reviewed: DBMS Inspection Report (4/25/07); NOV (5/5/07); SCC letter and map to DBMS <br />(5/22/07); NOV Modification (5/30/07); NOV Extension (5/30/07); memo from S. Brown to D. Berry <br />(6/t/07); letter from DBMS to SCC (6/4/07). <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />No NOVs have been issued at this mine during the 12 months preceding the issuance of this NOV. <br />The History component is therefore proposed to be set at $0. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.04.5(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed assessment may range from $0 [o $1750. The amount <br />proposed depends upon whether the violation was one of performance requirements or of <br />administrative requirements. This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />In the case of a violation of performance requirements, the amount to be assessed for Seriousness <br />depends upon (I) the probability of the occurrence of the event which a violated standard is <br />designed [o prevent, and (2) [he duration and extent of the potential or actual damage in terms of <br />area and impact on the public or environment. <br />(1) Run-off from snowmelt was not properly controlled, leading to the occurrence of events that <br />state law and MLRB regulations are designed to prevent. <br />(2) The violations cited were first observed by DRMS staff on Apri125 2007; they have yet to be <br />fully abated. Impact to the public and the environment appears limited to the damage having <br />occurred on private land. Extent appears limited to the area from the head of the gully at the <br />ou[slope of the light use road to the downstream toe of the sediment delta, measuring 110-125 <br />feet in length and 3-25 feet in width. As these events occurred within an area approved for <br />"minimal disturbance", the scouring beyond the toe of the delta is not included in the extent. <br />The Seriousness component of this assessment is therefore proposed to be set at $750. <br />Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $ t 500. <br />Assessments of "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of"negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />These events appears to be the result of a low level of negligence. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at $250. <br />Good Failh in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />The NOV has not yet been fully abated. <br />Good faith credit is therefore not proposed. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $1000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.