My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36777
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36777
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:14:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/1/1986
Doc Name
SNOWMASS COAL CO NORTH THOMPSON CREEK MINE MLRD NOV 06-17-1986 WQCD NOV 08-01-1986
From
WELBORN DUFFORD BROWN & TOOLEY
To
WQCD MLRD
Violation No.
CV1986051
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_, . :. <br />WELBORN, DUFFORD, BROWN f~ TOOLEY <br />Mr. Robert Shukle <br />Mr. David C. Shelton <br />September 30, 1986 <br />Page 3 <br />the B-seam workings and which could be diverted or plugged in a <br />way that would prevent the springtime increase in groundwater <br />flows; provided that, such study shall be completed by Snowmass <br />no later than June 30, 1987, at a cost not to exceed $ <br />(i) MLRD agrees that the performance of such <br />reconnaissance level study, and the completion of the physical <br />separation of the B-seam workings from the No. 1 Mine A-seam <br />workings shall constitute compliance with all applicable <br />provisions of the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, <br />the implementing regulations and Snowmass' Permit No. C-025-81 <br />with respect to discharges and flows in and from such B-seam <br />workings. <br />(j) WQCD agrees that the separation of flows <br />described in (g) above will reestablish the historic <br />groundwater flow eminating from the B-seam portal as it <br />occurred prior to the operation of the No. 1 Mine in the A-seam <br />workings. Such flows were not historically subject to an CDPS <br />discharge permit, and Snowmass has not created or caused the <br />addition of pollutants which may occur there. Therefore, the <br />WQCD concurs that no CDPS permit is legally required of <br />Snowmass unless it takes future actions which cause an addition <br />of pollutants to such historic discharges. <br />If these terms and conditions are generally <br />acceptable, we would be happy to discuss them with both of your <br />agencies so that we can reach a conclusion and a settlement <br />agreement can be drafted on a schedule compatible with the MLR <br />requirements. <br />Very truly yours, <br />WELBORN, DUFFORD, BROWN & TOOLEY <br />Richard L. Fanyo / <br />Attorneys for Snowmass Coal <br />Company <br />RLF/ppm <br />cc: James Stover <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.