Laserfiche WebLink
1 decision, but my understanding from the statement of <br />• 2 the recommendation that Mark has just made is that the <br /> 3 assessment is based on 40 days of violation ostensibly <br /> 4 from the August 31 inspection date and that is where <br /> 5 we are confused. So that is a determination, a fact <br /> 6 determination we would like the board .to make either -- <br /> 7 make a motion and vote on that or however you like to <br /> $ proceed because cae are confused. <br /> 9 MR. TURNER: Let's let Mark answer that <br /> 10 question. <br /> 11 f~IR. LOYE: T11is pit is a very large pit. <br /> 12 Under the Mined Land Reclamation Act, the activities i:l~at <br />• 13 are going on in this pit be they stockpile removal or <br /> 14 anything else, since no cease and desist order was on <br /> 15 this pit at all until last month for all mining, there <br /> 16 was no determination made as far as stockpile removal <br /> 17 or anything else. We have the word of the operator that <br /> 18 the only thing that happened on that site was stockpile <br /> 19 removal. This may very well be true. This was operated <br /> 20 in a fairly continuous manner with all these various <br /> 21 large amounts of acres being redisturbed for a period <br /> 22 of five and a half years. Now, on riy ocan professional <br /> 23 estimation as to what was disturbed, there was an <br /> 24 extensive disturbance that persisted for this period <br />• <br /> 25 of five and a half years. Now, I knew of the existence <br /> cll rr.+~ c a nrte rt.~x x .~s:ton a / rt. ! ~r <br /> <br /> l cnn cl,r.~~„nr ana/ <br /> Ln /n nn. Celnrndn Rn C! <br /> pil ,-n I ,V :: ~ <br />zs <br /> <br />