Laserfiche WebLink
19 <br /> 1 partially because certainly with individual operators <br />• 2 perhaps as opposed to counties, we didn't take any <br /> 3 enforcement action until somebody had been to the location <br /> 4 and since this is a pit and that it did not have a permit on <br /> 5 it. So I think we have tended to take things one at <br /> 6 a time. <br /> 7 MS. WINTER: You have been on the board <br /> 8 longer than I have, but since I have been on the board, <br /> 9 we have always done it the other way. 4lashington County <br /> 10 had 14. <br /> 11 MR. BARRY: We have done it the other way <br /> 12 ~•/ith counties. <br />• 13 MS. WINTER: I think in most cases, the <br /> 14 people have only had one penalty. They were fined $19,000. <br /> 15 They paid $2,000. So that was for 14 pits. So I do <br /> 16 thinF: that we have to have some consistency. <br /> 17 THE CHAIRMAN: Margie, I have a tendency <br /> 1S to disagree with you somewhat in what you're saying lie re <br /> 19 that it would seem to me if we took one pit as opposed <br /> 20 to several pits, the magnitude of the operation then <br /> 21 can be multiplied and if we're talking about one pit <br /> 22 at one particular time and the fine is determined on <br /> 23 that pit, then cae can hardly say that we can go forward <br /> 24 and include all other violations within that one operation. <br />• <br /> 25 MS. WINTER: I am not suggesting there <br /> t/L ElI (.iRRF.V 7Lfin 9).1'L'(li TFl'. /.V'C <br /> G•rnf: d .ShurprnnJ .4. rr•nrn <br /> IS00 (Grm rr//e RnnJ <br /> Lurlrunr. CuhnnJn 3001 <br /> ill L Jh l .V'.V <br /> <br />