My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36534
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36534
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:51 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:07:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/26/1992
Doc Name
FAX COVER
From
DMG
To
OSM
Violation No.
TD1992020244002TV2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />During its review of the permit revision, the Division determined <br />that good cause had been shown for a variance, in accordanc~a with <br />Rule 4.06.2(2)(a). In addition to preventing needless disturbance, <br />the Division determined that reclamation of the diversion would be <br />more effective without attempting to remove and replace topsoil. <br />The topsoil, which is next to the ditch and has been seeded, will <br />be replaced more effectively from its present position than would <br />be possible by hauling it in to the regraded ditch from a topsoil <br />stockpile during reclamation. The diversion in question is <br />approximately three miles long, is isolated from active mining <br />areas and, crosses slopes which are 2H:1V and steeper. Based upon <br />observations from the Division's inspection, approximately seventy- <br />five percent of the diversion is located on south, east and west- <br />facing slopes where less than six inches of topsoil is present. <br />Numerous sections of the diversion are excavated into bedrock <br />outcrops. <br />Copies of the materials referenced above are enclosed for your <br />review. Since no violation has occurred, the Division is not <br />taking enforcement action in regard to this issue. The Division <br />believes that this is an appropriate response to the TDN and is <br />neither arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion. <br />Issue 2 <br />A violation of Rule 4.08.5(7) for failure to provide blasting <br />sketches on blasting records is alleged. The TDN indicates that <br />sketches with information on number of holes, burden, spacing and <br />delay patterns were missing from the past year's records. <br />During the inspection which resulted in issuance of TDN X-92-020- <br />244-2 TV2, blasting records were reviewed. Colowyo's blasting <br />records include information regarding number of holes, burden, <br />spacing and delay patterns. Blasting patterns are indicated on the <br />records by symbols. However, these symbols are not explained on <br />the blasting forms. <br />As a result, NOV C-92-030 has been issued by the Division. With an <br />explanation of the symbols used on the records, all of the <br />information required by the regulations is included in the records. <br />The abatement required by the NOV calls for an explanation to be <br />added to the records of the past year and to all future records. <br />The symbols and data on the record will convey as much or more <br />information than a hand-drawn "sketch" since an understanding of <br />this information is required in order to understand a sketch. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.