My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36524
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:51 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:06:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981048
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/11/1992
Doc Name
VIOLATIONS C-92-013 014 019 020 & 021
From
GREG LEWICKI & ASSOCIATES
To
MLRD
Violation No.
CV1992021
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER TWO ~ HYDROLOGIC PRINCIPLES 83 <br />1te runoff poten- ~ treatment combinations. Other similar tables are available in various <br />ous land use and references (Soil Conservation Service, 1972}. Impervious areas and <br />water surfaces are assigned a CN of 98-100. Recognizing that abstrac- <br />'uburban, and Urban + bons from rainfall depend on the antecedent conditions that exist <br />at the time a rainstorm occurs, three antecedent conditions are de- <br />sacrc spry °aarv fined as in Table 2.21. The curve numbers given in Table 2.20 are <br />e c ° ~ for antecedent condition Il. To convert to antecedent condition I <br />~ ~ 91 or iii, the factors given in Table 2.22 may be used. Antecedent con- <br />r1 ,a e4 dition I is used when there has been little rainfall preceding the <br />rainfall in question and condition III is used where there has been <br />r9 B6 89 considerable rainfall prior to the rain in question. <br />A r4 B° <br />u r1 ,e Originally the CN values were assigned by plotting observed <br /> runoff versus measured rainfall for a number of experimental plots <br />~ n "' scattered throughout the U.S. The CN's were then correlated with <br />~ 70 " land use. Again, note that the CN approach is a runoff approach and <br /> not an infiltration approach. Certainly infiltration is a factor, but <br />v ,4 eo so is quick return flow and initial abstractions. Combining the CN <br />s9 r9 a4 approach with infiltration approaches such as minimum retention <br /> rates carries the CN concept beyond it original intent and beyond <br />'~ 94 9s the data on which the CN's are based. <br />OC 91 97 <br /> Table 2.? I Definition o(Antecedent Condition. <br />to 9° qp S-Day Antecedent Rainfall <br />rs e~ e, in inches <br />rx B1 e6 Dormant Growing <br />~ eo es _ Condition General Descnption Season Season <br />I fa 79 94 <br />;, <br />I Oplvnum soil condition from about lower < 0.5 < 1.4 <br />" ~ qa qa '-+ plants limit to wilting point <br />s <br /> 11 Average value for annual hoods 0.5 - 1, I 1.4 - 2. I <br />g ~E 9B 9B '~=~ <br />,; ~, e9 91 ;! <br />111 Heavy rainfall or light rainfall and low tempera- > 1.1 > 2.1 <br />_ ~ ar °9 lures within 5 days prior to the given storm <br />~e refer co <br />~•'~' `• Once the proper CN is obtained, equations 2.38 and 2.39 can <br />°1' be used to estimate the accumulated rainfall excess as a function <br />~~ _ of total accumulated rainfall. Figure 2.26 has been prepared to sim- <br />aP.~e eonale,a~ ~ plify the solution of equation 2.38. Curve numbers for complex areas <br />~' can be calculated b a wei htin <br />y g g procedure with the weighting factor <br />IY M". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.