My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-08-19_REVISION - M2003037 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2003037
>
2004-08-19_REVISION - M2003037 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:49:28 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:00:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003037
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/19/2004
Doc Name
112c Amend Appl
From
Haldorson and Sons Inc
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Although these depths are in the range which were expected, these depths measured should also be <br />accounted to the fact that the property where the mining will be conducted is currently under <br />irrigation by a local farmer, so depths during mining are expected to be lower than the levels <br />measured, but the mining plan will still be based upon these measurements. <br />Appendix B includes all of monitoring logs to date, as well as visual representations of the logs <br />throughout the monitoring period. <br />0) In January of 2004, Lambert and Associates collected samples of the gravei from a representative <br />depth and conducted sieve analyses as well as percolation tests in the Phase Al mining area. The <br />results of these tests are presented in a Lambert report included in Appendix B. <br />The sieve analyses show that a very small portion of the material is less than 200 mesh (clay size} <br />which would interfere with ground water movement, The two tests show 3.6% and 5.6% respectively. <br />Lambert indicates that this gravel should have a fast permeability rate. <br />Two test borings were also made in the Phase Al area, which were tested for percolation rates. <br />Lambert states that the results show that the material offers little to no resistance to water flow. <br />The combination of these two tests show that it is highly unlikely that water movement would be <br />inhibited, therefore, any water movement from irrigation would likely be near the bottom of the <br />gravel. In the water well drilling in Phase Al described above, the drill logs show that the gravel near <br />the bottom of the holes does contain some silt. Hole W-Al shows silty gravel layers beginning to <br />appear at a depth of44 feet, while the remaining 3 holes in Phase Al through A3 (WA-2 through W- <br />A4) show the top of the silty gravel at depths of 48 feet to 54 feet. Given these depths, and given the <br />fact that the silty gravel will still allow water movement; there is virtually no chance that water could <br />be encountered within 35 feet of the surface, even during irrigation season. <br />11) A Ph.D hydrologist was also employed to analyze the predicted level of groundwater flow <br />based on Darcy's equation and the hydrologic parameters that exist on the site. This report, <br />Haldorson Sand and Gravel Mine 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.