My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36249
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:39 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:59:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000090
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/31/2002
Doc Name
Board Order
From
DMG
To
Loukonen Bros. Stone
Violation No.
MV2002020
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BEFORE THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER <br />IN THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION OF LOUKONEN BROTHERS STONE, FILE NO. <br />M-2000-090, MV-2002-020. <br />THIS MATTER came before the Mined Land Reclamation Board on July 24, 2002 at Denver, Colorado <br />For hearing on a notice of alleged violation issued to Loukonen Brothers Stone (hereinafter Respondent), in <br />accordance with § 34-32.5-124, C.R.S. Mike Loukonen appeared on behalf of Respondent. Erica Crosby <br />appeazed on behalf of the Division of Minerals and Geology (hereinafter Division). The Board, having <br />considered the position of the parties, and having been otherwise fully informed in the premises, hereby finds <br />and concludes as follows: <br />FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br />1. The Board has jurisdiction over this matter, pursuant to C.R.S. § 34-32-124. <br />2. The subject of this action is a 9.9-acre sandstone mine known as the Lykins Gulch Quarry, Iocated in <br />Section 1, T2N, R71 W, Boulder County, Colorado, <br />3. The Division inspected this pit on June 13, 2002. The inspector found that a portion of the rock waste pile <br />located in the south quarry is outside the permit boundary. The size of the portion in question is <br />approximately fifteen feet by two hundred fifty feet. <br />4. The Division inspector also found that the operator had constructed a staging area outside the permit area <br />to store product from [he Lykins Gulch mining operation and mine equipment on an area approximately <br />one acre in size. <br />5. The Respondent did not contest the inspector's findings. I[ owns the property in question. The <br />Respondent was operating under the assumption that i[ could store mine product and material anywhere on <br />its property. The Respondent used the azea in question because it was fiat and well suited for storage. <br />6. C.R.S. § 34-32.50-103(13) defines mining operations to include the extraction of constmction material <br />from its natural occurrence on affected land. C.R.S. § 34-32.50-103(1) defines "affected land" to include <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.