My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36205
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:37 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:58:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/17/2002
Doc Name
Notice of Violation
From
DMG
To
Lorencito Coal Company
Violation No.
CV2002009
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The log indicates that 350-ms delays were used downhole. The permit states that <br />600-ms delays will be used downhole. <br />My reconstruction of the blast from the blast log and the blast sketch indicates <br />that there were 44 instances where two or more holes were detonated <br />within 8 milliseconds or less of each other. The permit states that blast <br />holes will have a 9-ms delay between each of them. <br />Rule 4.08.5(11) requires blast logs to have a record of the maximum weight of <br />explosives detonated within any 8-ms interval during the blast. My <br />reconstruction of the blast indicates that the maximum weight of <br />explosives detonated within any 8-ms interval during Blast #104-02 was <br />712 lbs/8 ms interval. The log indicates that the maximum weight of <br />explosives detonated within any 8-ms interval was 925 lbs/8 ms. This <br />indicates an incorrect use of the weighUdistance formula of Rule <br />4.08.4(10)(c)(i). <br />The distance between the blast and the Primero School was recorded on the log as <br />5300 feet; information provided later indicated the distance was 4300 feet, <br />contradicting the information on the log. Failing to properly identify the <br />distance between the blast and the school is a violation of Rule 4.08.5(4). <br />The number ofpersons in the blast crew is not recorded on the blast log, as <br />required by Rule 4.08.5(16). <br />A calibration signal of the seismograph's gain setting, or a certification of annual <br />seismograph calibration, was not available, as required by Rule <br />4.08.5(17)(a). <br />Blast 105-02: <br />The log and the blast sketch indicate that 272 holes were detonated. The permit <br />states that the maximum will be 72. <br />The log indicates that the blast holes were 12 feet deep. The permit states that the <br />blast holes would be at least 30 feet deep. <br />The log indicates that the blast holes were drilled on a ] Z' X 12' pattem. The <br />permit states that the blast holes will be drilled on a 16' X 18' pattem. <br />The log indicates that explosive material was placed in the blast holes to within 6 <br />feet of the surface. The permit states that explosive material will be <br />placed no closer than 10 feet from the surface. <br />The log indicates that the blast was initiated with an electric initiation system. <br />The permit states that initiation will bewith anon-electric system. <br />The log and blast sketch indicate that 25-ms surface delays were used along rows. <br />The permit states that 9-ms surface delays will be used along rows. <br />The log indicates that 42-ms delays were used somewhere in the pattern, but the <br />blast sketch does not identify their location. The permit states that 100-ms <br />surface delays will be used between rows. <br />The log indicates that 350-ms delays were used downhole. The permit states that <br />600-ms will be used downhole. <br />My reconstruction of the blast from the blast log and the blast sketch indicates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.