My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE36042
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE36042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:54:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
3/25/1993
Doc Name
NOTICE OF PROPOSED AMOUNT OF CIVIL PENALTY REQUEST FOR CONFERENCE
Violation No.
CV1993012
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cessation Order C-93-012 <br />Basin Resources <br />Golden Eagle Mine <br />This C.O. was issued (as modified on 3/25/93) for failure to <br />conduct mining operations to minimize water pollution by allowing <br />discharge of coal fines through a sediment pond. <br />A. HISTORY <br />One NOV was issued at the Golden Eagle Mine in the past twelve <br />months. NOV C-92-010 was issued on 6/22/92 and was upheld. $50 is <br />assessed for history. <br />B. SERIOUSNESS <br />Mine water discharge appears to have deposited coal fines in the <br />Purgatoire River alluvial valley floor and into the river itself. <br />Environmental damage was done outside the permit area by <br />contributing an undetermined amount of coal to the river. This <br />discharge apparently began sometime early in the day of March 25 <br />and continued until apprcximately 10:00 ~~ on Mach 27. $1750 ~.. <br />assessed for seriousness. <br />C. FAULT <br />The discharge structure on Pond 3 has a gated valve. The discharge <br />was initiated by the operator when the gate was opened. While the <br />operator may not have intended to cause off-site pollution the <br />discharge was an intentional act on the operator's part. The <br />discharge was allowed to continue for a number of hours p=_== t. <br />the time the DMG inspector became aware of the problem. $1506 is <br />assessed for fault. <br />D. NUMBER OF PAYS PENALTY ASSESSED <br />The cessation order required the violation be abated by 5:00 PM on <br />March 25, 1993 by ensuring that appropriate treatment of discharge <br />be done. The violation was abated at approximately 10:00 tiii o~i <br />March 27, 1993 when lab analyses indicated that water in Pond 2 <br />would meet NPDES effluent limits if it were discharrted *rnm rnar <br />pond. Discharge from Pond 3 was reduced but not completely stopped <br />during this time period. Therefore, the violation continued <br />unabated for two days beyond the abatement due date specified in <br />the C.O. Pursuant to Rule 5.04.6(3), a minimum of $750 per day <br />shall be assessed for each day beyond the abatement due date during <br />which a violation in a cessation order is not abated. $1500 is <br />assessed for two days. <br />E. GOOD FAITH <br />Since the violation continued unabated for two days beyond the <br />abatement due date, good faith is not applicable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.