Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmem of Natural Resources <br />1 313 Sherman 51 . Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone. 0031855-3557 <br />FA%:13071 832-8105 <br />April 14, 1997 <br />Mr. Larry M. Reschke <br />Powderhorn Coal Company <br />P.O. Box 1430 <br />Palisade, Colorado 81526 <br />RE: NOV C-97-001 abatement extension beyond 90 days <br />Roadside Mine (C-81-041) <br />Dear Mr. Reschke: <br />~~-- <br />E~'1 <br />nePntirrotErrr of <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCE <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames S Lochhead <br />Exec W ive Director <br />Michael & Long <br />Division DireUOr <br />I have reviewed your request of March 31, 1997, for extension of <br />NOV C-97-001 final abatement beyond the current abatement deadline <br />of April 23, 1997. Because April 23 is the 90th day following <br />issuance of the NOV, my concurrence with further extension is <br />required by Rule 5.03.2(2)(e). <br />My understanding is that final abatement of the subject NOV <br />involves construction of a settling pond proposed in pending <br />Technical Revision No. 22. The Division has requested certain <br />stability analyses as required by applicable regulations, which <br />will entail contracting with an engineering consultant to perform <br />the testing and report preparation. You have indicated that <br />results of the analyses will not be available for submittal to the <br />Division until the first week of May. For this reason, it will be <br />impossible for the Division to approve the revision authorizing <br />settling pond construction, until well after the abatement deadline <br />has passed. <br />It is also my understanding that interim measures undertaken in <br />response to NOV C-97-001 have addressed the immediate cause of the <br />TSS exceedance for which the NOV was issued, and that extension of <br />the abatement time frame will not result in any further <br />environmental damage. Further, it appears that you have met <br />interim abatement deadlines in a timely manner, and that the <br />inability to meet the final abatement deadline is not due to a lack <br />of diligence on your part. <br />