My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-05-17_REVISION - M1982015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982015
>
2006-05-17_REVISION - M1982015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:49:25 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:53:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/17/2006
Doc Name
Emails between DMG Jodi Villa Meurer & Assoc. Inc.
From
Meurer & Associates Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TOLL FREE: 1-066-535-5285 <br />EMAIL: jvilla~meurer.com <br />WEB: www.meurer.com <br />CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the <br />intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged <br />information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the <br />sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. The <br />sender and Meurer & Associates will not accept any responsibility for <br />viruses (if any) associated with this email or its possible attachments. <br />Gonima, Deb <br />From: Mount, Carl <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 8:47 AM <br />To: Crosby, Erica <br />Cc: Gonima, Deb; Wenzel, Richard <br />Subject: RE: Permit #: M-1982-015 <br />I just wanted an independent review of the adequacy letter to try to make sure that all the bonding information that we <br />would need later was requested. <br />C <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Crosby, Erica <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:25 AM <br />To: Mount, Carl <br />Cc: Gonima, Deb; Wenzel, Richard <br />Subject: RE: Permit #: M-1982-015 <br />That should work for me. <br />But, typically we do not put a bond estimate together until all of the adequacy items are addressed, and we have a <br />good idea of the mining and reclamation plan. Things tend to change so much during adequacy that it is not worth <br />putting together an estimate that will be changed down the road. I also told this to Rick the other day when he asked <br />for assistance with a 110 bond estimate. That being the case, they may have already the boot-camp bond training <br />scheduled for May. So I can then sit down with them individually (or all together) to help them put their estimates <br />together. What-cha think? <br />-Erica <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Mounr, Carl <br />Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:03 PM <br />To: Wenzel, Richard; Sorenson, Allen; Schreiner, Tom; Crosby, Erica <br />Cc: Humphries, Bruce <br />Subject: FW: Permit #: M-1982-015 <br />Hello all, <br />This application was deemed complete on March 29. Publication may have happened the week of April 3 so I am <br />assuming that the public comment period will be over sometime in the week of May 15 or so. I believe this <br />application involves an already mined Siegrist Pit along the St. Vrain River that another company is putting a slurry <br />wall around and building houses next to. <br />think Deb needs comments by no later than May 12, 2006 for engineering stability and floodplain/way issues. <br />The adequacy review letter should go out about a week after that so Erica may need to provide comments during <br />the week of May 15. Can do? <br />Please let me know <br />60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.