My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-05-17_REVISION - M1982015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982015
>
2006-05-17_REVISION - M1982015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:49:25 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:53:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/17/2006
Doc Name
Emails between DMG Jodi Villa Meurer & Assoc. Inc.
From
Meurer & Associates Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jodi <br />«DMG Comments from onsite mtg.doc » <br />Jodi Villa, P.E. <br />Project Manager <br />Meurer & Associates, Inc. <br />Engineers ~ Designers ~ Consultants <br />143 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 <br />Lakewood, CO 80228 <br />TEL: 303-985-3636 <br />TOLL FREE: 1-866-535-5285 <br />EMAIL: jvilla~meurer.com <br />WEB: www.meurer.com <br />CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the <br />intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged <br />information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the <br />sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. The <br />sender and Meurer & Associates will not accept any responsibility for <br />viruses (if any) associated with this email or its possible attachments. <br />Gonima, Deb <br />From: Jodi Villa [JVilla@Meurer.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:02 AM <br />To: 'Gonima, Deb' <br />Subject: RE: DMG Comments (3811-DMG) <br />Spam: 0 <br />Deb, <br />In going over your fax, it says the DMG would appreciate it if the items <br />listed were NOT submitted until after the adequacy review letter has been <br />received by the operator. Weren't we planning on addressing them before you <br />prepared the letter so that you didn't have to put them in the letter and we <br />could get them taken care of asap?? <br />Thanks, <br />Jodi <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Gonima, Deb [mailto:deb.gonima@state.co.us] <br />Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 4:03 PM <br />To: 'Jodi Villa' <br />Cc: Gonima, Deb <br />Subject: RE: DMG Comments (3811-DMG) <br />Hi Jodi, <br />I'll send the fax in a few minutes. The public comment period is up 20 days <br />after the last of the 4 consecutive publications have run. So, if your 4th <br />consecutive publication runs on, say May 5th, the public comment period is <br />over 20 calendar days after that, and then shortly thereafter you'll get our <br />Adequacy Review Letter. Which is also why we want to get you as much info as <br />possible now with our inspection report. This way you'll be able to provide <br />us with all the info very soon after the adequacy letter comes out & there <br />will be less info to gather in a short time. So, the inspection report will <br />be like a preview to our adequacy letter. <br />Just so I know - when exactly is your 4th & last publication going out? <br />Here's the report - you'll be getting a hard copy in the mail, shortly. <br />47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.