Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />zl <br />1 my--yeah, yes. It does raise a point, and I'll raise <br />2 this point: You have a very specific board order at this <br />3 point. I could come to the board and say that the <br />4 division is satisfied that the corrective action has been <br />5 taken care of, but the way it was taken care of may not <br />6 fall in line explicitly with what that order stated. It <br />7 may be appropriate to just handle that sort of technical <br />8 point--procedural technical point for us to notice this <br />9 as a hearing next month with regard to the order under <br />10 the violation. Then we come back and state what happened <br />11 and state the modification to say that, so that is very <br />12 clear and on the record. <br />13 MR. DONALD: If we notice it, it has to <br />14 have that flexibility. <br />15 CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR: That being preliminary <br />16 to the amendment itself? <br />17 MR. BANTA: Preliminary. I've discussed <br />18 that a little bit with Castle Concrete, and they may want <br />19 to address that point. <br />20 My feeling is the division could have <br />21 accepted a final plan at some point and would have been <br />22 in our--sort of discretion, prerogative whether to pursue <br />23 if they were in violation of the order. <br />24 But given there are other parties involved <br />25 in the peculiar circumstances of this case, it may be <br />